specify anywhere, it's an output of
> trac-all. Do you have read permmission to that file?
>
> a.y
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Gerit Pfuhl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>> thanks, no doubt that the files are okay, it must be something in how
>> tracula is set up I supose bec
Rotation PercentBadSlices AvgDropoutScore
> 1.74706 0.0119408 0 1
>
> I tried this both on a mac and a linux machine and got the same result.
> Sorry but I cannot replicate your error.
>
> a.y
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Gerit Pfuhl wrote:
>
> tried adopted version of
t's no surprise that the error doesn't occur in 5.2, because 5.2
> doesn't run dmri_motion at all.
>
> When you run dmri_motion on the command line, do you use the same syntax
> as the one you're showing below?
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Gerit Pfuhl wrote:
>
&
th 5.3 occur when dmri_motion is run or
> at a different step?
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Gerit Pfuhl wrote:
>
> Dear Tracula Experts,
>> after careful checking we still cannot run trac-all -qa or dwri-motion as
>> the command always returns: could not
>> open b
could not open bvals]
Kind regards
Gerit Pfuhl
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed
Dear Freesurfer experts,
we are curious whether we can run trac-all -qa in 5.3. and use it as
regressors with our results from tracula 5.2.
I.e. is it advisable or shall we run the complete analysis?
Thanks,
Gerit Pfuhl
___
Freesurfer mailing list
the QC on the T1 data gives no obvious clue. We edit the brainmask when
there are surface issues
However, we have not quantified this data yet - a closer look may indeed
tell us more.
Thanks
Gerit
On 16 July 2013 20:52, Pfuhl, Gerit wrote:
>
>
> Von: Ana
>
> Hi,
>
> we have more motion in the anatomical data between the groups (healthy
> controls vs patients).
> The difference between 5.1 using flt and 5.2. using bbr is not extreme.
> If I understood correctly, since we use first recon-all and thatis
> independent of flt or bbr, any difference must
g that to something other than the default number in your
> configuration file?
>
> a.y
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Gerit Pfuhl wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>>
>> please find attached the trac-all.log file.
>>
>> Regards
>> Gerit
>>
>>
>&g
Dear Freesurfer experts,
for one subject (out of over 80 already processed) I get i nthe last step
an error I am unable to locate. The output from the tracula -path command
says at the end: option 0 unknown.
There are no reported problems in -prep, and -bedp. The script uses default
values (I run
are
running bedpostx outside of trac-all (i.e. trac-prep then bedpostx then
trac-path) might it be an issue that is solved with installing the 5.2.
version? Would that run in freesurfer 5.1.0?
I guess we need to change the dcmrirc files only a bit.
Kind regards
Gerit Pfuhl
On 3 April 2013 16:59
11 matches
Mail list logo
