2 07:49 AM, Erlend Hodneland wrote:
> Both the fmri data registered to orig is mismatched, and also the original
> raw fmri data are mismatched with orig,
> see the link here showing our raw data (fmri, orig and 152MNI) shown in
> fslview
>
> http://vedlegg.uib.no/?id=297a1242fa82b
2 07:49 AM, Erlend Hodneland wrote:
> Both the fmri data registered to orig is mismatched, and also the original
> raw fmri data are mismatched with orig,
> see the link here showing our raw data (fmri, orig and 152MNI) shown in
> fslview
>
> http://vedlegg.uib.no/?id=297a1242fa82b
that we show yes.
Erlend
What images are mismatched? Specifically, which anatomical image are you
loading into fslview?
If you have not loaded the orig.mgz (converted to nii), then there will be be a
mismatch.
doug
On 04/24/2012 04:29 AM, Erlend Hodneland wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> We are
pics are oriented
correctly the registration is way off. What images are you loading into
fslview? You'll need to convert the orig.mgz into nii and load that to
check the registration.
doug
On 04/22/2012 04:16 AM, Erlend Hodneland wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> the registration looks fine
--t2 --o test.nii.gz
where vol0001 is the first volume in the fmri sequence and is flipped to
align with LAS (as the highres).
Thank you for your kind help,
Erlend Hodneland
ean that it is in the wrong orientation? It should be in
the same orientation as the anatomical. How does the reg look in
the output being flipped in wrong orientation for all options.
We would greatly appreciate if you have any suggestions for how to overcome
this problem!
Cheers/Sincerly/All best
Erlend Hodneland
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard
