Re: [Freesurfer] Command to convert subcortical values into subcortical segmentation

2018-12-11 Thread Conchy PF
gt; segmentation, not subcortical > > On 12/9/18 5:57 PM, Conchy PF wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > Hello FS experts, > > I was wondering if there is a command similar to annotval2surfoverlay.m > that allows converting subcortical values into aseg.annot subc

[Freesurfer] Command to convert subcortical values into subcortical segmentation

2018-12-09 Thread Conchy PF
External Email - Use Caution Hello FS experts, I was wondering if there is a command similar to annotval2surfoverlay.m that allows converting subcortical values into aseg.annot subcortical segmentation. Thank you in advance and kind regards, Lisbeth _

Re: [Freesurfer] PET processing seg fault with mri_glmfit --mrtm1

2017-11-14 Thread Conchy PF
:36 PM, Conchy PF wrote: > Sorry, I forgot the time.dat file. Here it goes. > > Thank you, > > CP > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Conchy PF wrote: > >> Dear Douglas, >> >> I did not save the full output from the beginning when I processed this >&g

Re: [Freesurfer] PET processing seg fault with mri_glmfit --mrtm1

2017-11-13 Thread Conchy PF
Sorry, I forgot the time.dat file. Here it goes. Thank you, CP On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Conchy PF wrote: > Dear Douglas, > > I did not save the full output from the beginning when I processed this > subject. I can send you what I get when I run the > > mri_glmfit co

Re: [Freesurfer] PET processing seg fault with mri_glmfit --mrtm1

2017-11-13 Thread Conchy PF
Nov 13, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote: > Can you send the full terminal output? ie, evverything that is printed > to the screen until the program exits? Also, can you send the nii.gz, > .dat, and time.dat file? > > > On 11/13/2017 03:16 PM, Conchy PF wrote: > > D

Re: [Freesurfer] PET processing seg fault with mri_glmfit --mrtm1

2017-11-13 Thread Conchy PF
. I am running the command on a Mac OS X 10.9.5. What do you think? Thank you and kind regards, CP On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote: > Please check the reference TAC. Also, please send the full terminal output > > > On 11/11/2017 06:07 AM, Conchy PF wro

[Freesurfer] PET processing seg fault with mri_glmfit --mrtm1

2017-11-11 Thread Conchy PF
Dear Douglas, I had the same problem as Jonathan described in his post "PET processing seg fault with mri_glmfit --mrtm1" ( https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2016-January/043144.html ). In my case, I used this command: mri_glmfit --y gtmpvc/km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm1 gtmpvc/km

[Freesurfer] Fwd: Fwd: Optseq2: ntp

2014-05-05 Thread Conchy PF
Hi everybody, I have a question about optseq2. In order to calculate ntp, I need to know the total time that my run lasts. Thus, I do not know whether I have to include in the total trial time the fixation cross time (500 ms) + event (1000 ms) + variable ISI average (1 s, ranging from 500 to 4000

Re: [Freesurfer] Fwd: Optseq2: ntp

2014-05-04 Thread Conchy PF
ts > doug > > > > On 5/2/14 3:07 PM, Conchy PF wrote: > > Dear Douglas, > > I would like to use optseq2 to set up my experiment sequence. However it > is not clear for me what “number of time points” means. I guessed that it > was the number a waveform is sampled, bu

[Freesurfer] Fwd: Optseq2: ntp

2014-05-02 Thread Conchy PF
Dear Douglas, I would like to use optseq2 to set up my experiment sequence. However it is not clear for me what “number of time points” means. I guessed that it was the number a waveform is sampled, but I saw in some mailing lists that it is the time the event is repeated during the run. In case