Hi Douglas,
Thanks for your support.
From the below conclusion, can I say
Total ventricular CSF = (lh + rh) Lateral-Ventricle + = (lh +
rh)Inf-Lat-Vent + (lh + rh)choroid-plexus + 3rd-Ventricle + 4th-Ventricle + 5th
Ventricle + CSF.
Also Is it correct t
Hi Anastasia and FS experts,
I am trying to create a white matter ROI mask underneath a cortical ROI label
(e.g., 2 mm into the white matter) created in fsaverage space. I will then use
this mask to extract values from individual dtifit_FA and dtifit_MD maps
generated by trac-all. What would be
Hi Walter – I’d check on the structural segmentation and its registration to
the DWIs. Open dmri/dtifit_FA.nii.gz and label/diff/aparc+aseg.bbr.nii.gz and
check if they’re well aligned and if the segmentation looks fine.
On a separate note (and I don’t know if it’s related to the error you’re as
Hi Yuwen - TRACULA is pretty forgiving in terms of imperfections in the
recon-all output. TRACULA uses only the aparc+aseg, after mapping it into
the subject¹s diffusion space, which is typically lower-res than the
structural. Also, TRACULA only uses the relative positions of white matter
voxels to
Hi Lars – That’s correct, you don’t need to run cross-sectional TRACULA first,
you just need to run longitudinal recon-all before you run longitudinal
TRACULA, and it expects that the time points and base template subject IDs are
the same for recon-all and for TRACULA. It sounds like the time po
Dear members,
Please feel free to distribute the job ad below as you see fit.
Best,
Bengi Baran, Ph.D.
Instructor in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School
Massachusetts General Hospital
Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
149 13th Street, Room 2626
Charlestown Navy Yard
Charlestown, MA 02129
em
Hi,
Thanks for your reply, and I contacted with nibabel team based on your
advice.
They advice me to update my nibabel to the newest version, and now these
data can be got properly:)
Besides, I'm interested in the different dimension between `-surface self'
and `-surface fsaverage`, they both
Hi Freesurfers,
I am doing a surfaced based ROI analysis on each of my subjects functional
data. Using information from other papers, the size of the ROI really matters
when doing the analysis, and I want to take this information from these papers
and apply them to my own data. However, these
It does work with 6.0, thank you!
2017-07-31 20:59 GMT+03:00 Douglas Greve :
> I think this may be fixed in 6.0
>
> On 7/31/17 12:43 PM, Francesca Strappini wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0.
>
> I opened it with fslview and it looks like a nor
Thank you very much! :)
Best Wishes,
Elijah
On 31 July 2017 at 15:37:38, Douglas Greve (gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) wrote:
yes, mean across space. for vertex wise, you'll probably have to go into
matlab, something like
mask = MRIread('mask.mgh');
imask = find(mask.vol == 1);
cc = MRIread('co
10 matches
Mail list logo