No, not yet, although they are high on our list
Bruce
> On Oct 10, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Ankita Sharma wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Does anyone know if subthalamic nuclei and substantial nigra are part of the
> automated sub-cortical segmentation (aseg) in Freesufer?
> Thanks,
> Ankita!
>
> __
Hi, FreeSurfer Users.
I am comparing cortical thickness of 2 groups controlled for certain variables
of no interest.
My contrast matrix is
1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to check for group 1 thickness > group 2 thickness
I get my sig.mgh and I want to run mri_surfcluster command to correct for FDR.
Hi Raghav
you should be able to use the -rl flag in mri_convert. Something like
mri_convert -rl rawavg.mgz orig.mgz orig.268slices.mgz
or, if you want nifti directly
mri_convert -rl rawavg.mgz orig.mgz orig.268slices.nii.gz
cheers
Bruce
On
Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Raghav Mehta wrote:
Hi Bru
Hi,
Does anyone know if subthalamic nuclei and substantial nigra are part of
the automated sub-cortical segmentation (aseg) in Freesufer?
Thanks,
Ankita!
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/l
Hi,
I would like to install the FreeSurfer 6 beta on my macbook pro (OS X El
capitan 10.11.6, XQuartz 2.7.9 installed).
I allowed applications downloaded from Anywhere in privacy and settings, and
disabled csrutil (the System Integrity Protection, a security feature that
hobbles some of the ca
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I am trying to do the group analysis, before this I tried to smooth the data
with the different smoothing kernel. However, when I checked the output dir, it
turned out that data were smoothed with a larger smoothing kernel than I
expected. For example, images intended t
