We are experiencing center-wide hardware problems, and it's likely to be down
for a while
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:07 PM, Chris Filo Gorgolewski
> wrote:
>
> FYI - there is something wrong with the FTP server:
>
> $ wget
> ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/5.3.0-HCP/freesu
FYI - there is something wrong with the FTP server:
$ wget
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/5.3.0-HCP/freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0-HCP.tar.gz
--2016-09-15 20:04:51--
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/5.3.0-HCP/freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86
Hello, freesurfer users.
Reposting the previous question again here. I would appreciate any response.
I tried searching for this question on the mailing list but couldn't get an
answer. Hence, I am posting this here again.
I ran the freesurfer analysis and got cortical thickness map for my group
Dear Freesurfer experts,
1. I want to compare the area and/or areapial between two groups in qdec
menu.
I think that the eTIV or total surface area should be used as a covariate.
Which is more appropriate between eTIV and total surface area?
2. Is there any guideline or rule for the smoothing in
Dear Freesurfers,
I am interested us using centrum semiovale as reference region while
calculation SUVR values. Is there a way to save the unsegmented white
matter [5001& 5002] during the gtmseg step ?
in other words looking for an option like this
--keep-unsegmented-WM :do not relabel unsegment
Hello Freesurfer Experts,
I was running permutation simulations on cortical thickness data and I
had an issue with non-orthogonal covariates with mri_glmfit-sim -perm. I
then tried FSL's PALM which is an extension of randomize to calculate
threshold free stats. I saved the output as logp(which
I don't think you are modeling gender and scanner appropriately. It
looks like you have them as continuous covariates? The right way is to
create classes. In your case, you'd have 8 classes, Group1MaleScanner1,
Group1FemaleScanner2, etc.
On 09/15/2016 10:48 AM, Eryilmaz, H. Hamdi wrote:
> Dear
Dear Doug/FreeSurfers,
We are looking at effects of age-squared on cortical thickness in two different
groups. We are interested in age-squared by group interactions on cortical
thickness across the surface. Nuisance covariates include age, sex, scanner,
and total brain volume.
The sig map f
