Hi all,
I ran an analysis on data after dividing each voxel mean across the run,
and then multiplying by 100. (My intuition was that the percent signal
change should be more consistent across varying SNR that the non-normalized
betas).
I had naively expected ces.nii and cespct.nii to be equivalen
Dear Freesurfer/Tracula team,
I would like to convert some of the outputs from Tracula into wavefront
objects in order to render them in Unity. Does anyone have any advice
on how to do so?
Based on previous threads and looking into Brainder.org's aseg2surf, I
assume I need to use a combination o
Hi Bruce,I am wondering if you saw my last email, about uploading my subject in
your ftp server.I uploaded the subject "test_emc_039.tar.gz".I appreciate any
help.
Thank you, Maryam
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
http
Hi Bruce,Did you get my email regarding to the subject I upload in fft server?
Best,Maryam
Regards,Maryam Kouchakidivkolaei
On Friday, June 3, 2016 10:16 PM, maryam koochaki
wrote:
Hi Bruce,I already uploaded it.File name: test_emc_039.tar.gz
Thanks,Maryam
Regards,Maryam
Hi Carolyn,
not sure what you are asking. You want to do statistics on N=1 subject ?
Anyway, in order to use QDEC, you'd have to reduce the longitudinal data
(thickness, measured at different time points) to a single number: the
slope of a linear fit. This is called the 2-stage-approach.
Or
Hi Gonzalo,
indeed, here are the references Bruce is refering to:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19233293
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16651008
Image contrast to noise ratio per unit time of acquisition is different
because of different T1s and lower SNR. Different scan durations will
fsaverage is distributed with freesurfer. Do you have freesurfer
installed on your new computer? If so, then just create a symbolic link with
cd $SUBJECTS_DIR
ln -s $FREESURFER_HOME/subjects/fsaverage
On 06/04/2016 04:44 PM, shi yao wang wrote:
> Hello, Thank you very much for the reply!
>
> 1.
looks like you put your command on two different lines
On 06/06/2016 05:16 AM, Hao wen wrote:
> Sorry, if you received my email, cuz I really stucked here, and i
> didnt find the related topics in the freesurfer support archive!
> Thank you in advance
> ---
Hi Gonzalo
we seek to minimize these explicitly, but given the difference in T1s at
different field strength it's pretty hard to get rid of them completely.
Xiao Han wrote a paper on this, and I think Jorge Jovicich did as well
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Gonzalo Rojas Costa
wrote:
Hi:
There exist any difference between the volumetric values obtained
using 1.5T and 3.0T images ? Any paper about it ?
Sincerely,
Gonzalo Rojas Costa
Laboratory for Advanced Medical Image Processing
Department of Radiology
Clínica las Condes
Lo Fontecilla 441, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
T
Hello,
I have six scans for a single subject. I have performed "group analysis,"
but wish to use longitudinal data analysis. In particular, I was able to
get a base for the subjects, so can view in freeview and all of that. My
issue arises when I try to use QDEC. Because QDEC can't use my
long.qde
Sorry, if you received my email, cuz I really stucked here, and i didnt find
the related topics in the freesurfer support archive!
Thank you in advance
De : Hao wen
Envoyé : mercredi 1 juin 2016 19:32:24
À : freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Objet : RE: [Freesurfer] C
12 matches
Mail list logo