Hi Thomas,
Thanks, I have taken your advise and used the LooseMask for the 7
network parcellation in steps 3a and b. How do I now mask it again with
FreeSurfer's segmentation of striatal regions as you have suggested?
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Aus
Hi Bronwyn,
I was using that as a placeholder. You can use any of these:
Choi2012_7Networks_MNI152_FreeSurferConformed1mm_LooseMask.nii.gz
Choi2012_7Networks_MNI152_FreeSurferConformed1mm_TightMask.nii.gz
Choi2012_17Networks_MNI152_FreeSurferConformed1mm_LooseMask.nii.gz
Choi2012_17Networks_MNI15
Hi Douglas,
Thank you so much for your help!
Regards,
Heidi Foo
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Douglas N Greve
wrote:
> To see whether the final label is correct, load the label in freeview or
> tksurfer and see if it looks right.
>
> You can use mris_anatomical_stats to get the volumes, etc
Hi Thomas,
I am not sure which file you are referring to when you say
"Choi_atlas1mm.nii.gz". The files I have from the freesurfer wiki are:
Choi_JNeurophysiol12_MNI152_README
Choi2012_7Networks_ColorLUT.txt
Choi2012_7Networks_MNI152_FreeSurferConformed1mm_LooseMask.nii.gz
Choi2012_7Ne
Hi freesurfer experts,
I have successfully run the brainstem module for some subjects. On visual
checking, I can see there are voxels with T1 hypointense lesions
mislabelled as non-brainstem tissue. I manually corrected them on the
brainstemSsLabels.v10.mgz on Freeview. Then how do I obtain this n
Hi Doug,
Thanks for the explanation. In using p=0.05 with my thickness files
(smoothed 15mm translates to FWHM=21mm), I looked at fwhm21/abs/th13/ cdf
file.
In regards to Qdec , if I choose abs, does the p=0.05/1.3 option mean the
overall alpha (ie 2.5% for A>B, 2.5% for B>A ) or is it the alp
