Dear Mahinda,
For the mris_preproc, I think Doug posted already explaining how it works -
it uses a jacobian correction in a way that makes it mass-conservative. You
may want to search the archives. For the ROIs, the standard method is to
add up the areas of their constituent vertices, so it shoul
Hello all,
I posted this question on the cmtk users google group, but no takers,
and perhaps this is the more appropriate venue anyways.
I've been successfully using cmtk within iPython. After running
connectomemapper parcellate() to get the Lausanne parcellation scheme, I
get six .annot fil
Hi Jon
can you send us an image, perhaps with an arrow in it showing us what you
mean?
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, jonwie...@netzero.net wrote:
> I did an AutoRecon3 on a brain and when i viewed the results. it failed to
> classify some the tgray and white matter in the left hemisphere.
Hallo, now I use cc...
Actually I gave you wrong info - I DID rename file patient.mgz to 001.mgz
and not orig.mgz as I wrote before, sorry.
I attach recon-all.log file with errors from my last run. It is about nu_
correct.
Thanks for help, Petr
-- Původní zpráva --
I did an AutoRecon3 on a brain and when i viewed the results. it failed to
classify some the tgray and white matter in the left hemisphere. the area
misses is on the extreme left side of the brain, within 10 mm of the left side
of the hemisphere. are there some arguments i change change to fix t
Hi FreeSurfer folks,
we are about to process about 120 images with FS v5.1 and stand in front
of a decision whether to do manual intervention or use the results from
fully-automated FS run.
We intend to use the volume, thickness, area, curvature measures of
subcortical and cortical regions an
Hello Freesurfer experts,
I am working on a study that wants to compare pre/post cortical thickness on an
intervention group and a control group. I am using FS 5.1 on a Mac. I have
processed all the recons through the longitudinal stream as described in the
wiki/tutorial. However when I go to pr
Hi Mia
this is fixed in the newest version. You can grab a new mris_topo_fixer
and you rerun and it should be all set. You probably should take a look
at the ?h.orig.nofix to make sure it's reasonable (meaning no cerebellum
or skull attached, and the hemispherees successfully separated)
cheers
You will need to create an annotation of the lobes (use
mri_annotation2label --lobesStrict, or define your own). Then run
mri_aparc2aseg with the --labelwm option. You can look in a
recon-all.log for the other command options
doug
On 01/17/2013 07:54 AM, Gabriel Gonzalez Escamilla wrote:
> D
Hi Mia
we need to see the recon-all.log. Did it end with an error?
Bruce
On Thu, 17 Jan
2013, Borzello, Mia wrote:
> Hi Freesurfers,
>
> I just ran a recon, and it seems that only the lh.pial computed, but not the
> rh.pial. What would be the cause of this?
> Thanks,
> m
>
> __
Hi Freesurfers,
I just ran a recon, and it seems that only the lh.pial computed, but not the
rh.pial. What would be the cause of this?
Thanks,
m
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listin
Hi Petr,
Try renaming /subject/patient/mri/orig/orig.mgz to
/subject/patient/mri/orig/001.mgz and rerunning recon-all. The orig.mgz
file is created later on in the recon-all stream.
-Louis
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Louis Nicholas Vinke wrote:
Please remember to cc the list.
-- Forwarded
Please remember to cc the list.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:07:43 +0100 (CET)
From: zach.p...@post.cz
To: Louis Nicholas Vinke
Subject: Re: Re: [Freesurfer] nu_correct problem
Hallo, I use VB Ubuntu on standard PC machine downloaded from Freesurfer web
pa
Dear freesurfersI'm trying to get the WM parcellation by lobes, I have read some previous FS archives regarding a similar topic, but they only want the volume value, and I'm interested in a WM lobes parcellation in mgz format (like aseg.mgz ), and I'm also interested in knowing if is possible to ob
14 matches
Mail list logo