Hi professor,
The attachment is the subject after running the recon-all command. MR data were
obtained on a 1.5T Philips Achieva Nova Dual MR scanner. the sequence name is
T1W.3D.FFE.SENSE and the voxel size is 0.90*0.90*1mm. how should I fix the poor
quality surface reconstruction?
Thanks a
Hi FreeSurfer Experts,
Using the mri_surfcluster command, I got the labels of the significant regions
from qdec comparisons of thickness between two groups.
The diffusion data was not processed using the dt_recon, but DTI-studio. So how
can I map the significant regions to the individual diffusio
Rather one unsets it like this:
unset POSIXLY_CORRECT
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Glasser [mailto:m...@ma-tea.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:47 PM
To: 'freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] ERROR: comparison in expression (FS with SGE)
Another no
p.s. looks like an intensity normalization failure. Can you give us details
of the acquisition? Sequence name, voxel resolution, etc? If you upload
the subject I'll take a look
cheers
Bruce
On Sat, 19 May 2012,
limengsecret wrote:
Hi Professor,
The image blow shows the problems which o
Hi Meng
1. Not positive I understand, but I don't think it should matter.
2. we'll need to see some data to diagnose this.
cheers
Bruce
On Sat, 19 May 2012, ?? wrote:
Hi FreeSurfer Experts,
I had 2 question about the output troubleshooting.
1) when I used the mri_convert command,
Hi FreeSurfer Experts,
I had 2 question about the output troubleshooting.
1) when I used the mri_convert command, the format of the input image I
choosed was 4D nii format, but not the original dicom format, which would
affect the result of reconstruction?
2) When I checked the qual
