[Freesurfer] longitudinal analysis 5.0 or 5.1?

2012-04-18 Thread Cat Chong
  Dear Freesurfers:   We have a large group of subjects (for which we have two time-points) that were run  through the recon-all stream using 5.0.  We have done no manual editing yet.   We would like to do a longitudinal analysis of these subjects using 5.1 by comparing both time-points for each su

Re: [Freesurfer] WM modification

2012-04-18 Thread Gabriel Gonzalez Escamilla
Thanks Doug,Could you recommend me some kind of software or procedure to quantify lesion on my images?Regards,GabrielEl 17/04/12, Douglas N Greve escribió:It should not have changed the WM volume. Did you happen to see the thread about a bug in mri_segstats? It could be causing this. You can get

Re: [Freesurfer] Subcortical Segmentation Failures with Freesurfer v. 5.10

2012-04-18 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Joshua if you can upload one dataset where the new version is poor and the old one is good I'll look into it. Thanks for helping to track this down Bruce On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Joshua Lee wrote: Hi All, I thought I'd share my recent experiences with the newest Freesurfer v. 5.10 and subc

Re: [Freesurfer] FWHM smoothing for surface based

2012-04-18 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Charlotte, there's no one answer to this question. It depends on the spatial extent of the effect you are looking for, the level of noise, the number of subjects in your study, etc... A rule of thumb is the "matched filter theoreom" - you want the size of the smoothing kernel to be about the