Applications are invited for two postdoctoral positions and one data analyst
position funded by an ERC (European Research Council) Starting Grant. The
research program examines the cognitive mechanisms and neural systems by which
the human brain codes the recent past and predicts the immediate
It is better to use mri_label2vol using the registration matrix for the
functional. You can set the "fill threshold" to control the percent of a
segmentation that must be present in a voxel to declare that voxel to be
in that segment. I would not set this to 1 (ie, 100%) as this can lead
to som
yes, use the FreeSurfer MRIread matlab command
Oya, Hiroyuki (UI Health Care) wrote:
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> Is it possible to load the outputs of mri_vol2surf with matlab?
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Hiroyuki
>
>
>
> ___
The FIR does not assume a shape to the HRF but fits each point within
the given time window. You might not be seeing activation for several
reasons. FIRs are much less efficient than gamma functions. Also, by
default, the FIR analysis gives you a sig map at each time point in the
FIR, so you mi
That version of fsfast is not version 5. The version ID for
fast_selxavg3 is from april 2009.
doug
Eyal Dechter wrote:
> Hi, I'm analyzing fMRI data using freesurfer 5.0.0. I run into the
> following error when running selxavg3-sess. Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Eyal
>
>
You used the volume registration method and that won't work for
surfaces. If the original label is from a surface, then use the
surface-based registration method.
doug
Jin Li wrote:
> Hello there,
> I tried mri_label2label to convert label in a subject's space into
> label into fsaverage's spa
Freesurfers,
So you can ignore this last question. I double-checked my addition and got
1046270 for the sum of all structures which is indeed more than
BrainSegNotVent. Oops.
Chris
On Nov 3 2010, bell0...@umn.edu wrote:
>
>
>One other thing. I did the addition of all the structures in aseg a
One other thing. I did the addition of all the structures in aseg and
am a bit confused. Here are the numbers for one subject.
BrainSeg= 1035602
BrainSegNotVent= 1034954
These two are almost identical but that is most likely due to the
lack of pv correction in BrainSeg, so I think that makes se
I had a question about gray matter and white matter volumes in FreeSurfer
version 4.5. Sorry, we have too many subjects to rerun easily through 5.0.
There is no gray matter listed in aseg.stats in 4.5. The two options I see
are using mris_volume or summing the aparc gray matter structures, are
did you check the accuracy of the talairach with tkregister2 or tkmedit?
If it's really bad, then you can either fix it with tkregister2, or tell
recon-all to not use it. If it is accurate but being incorrectly flagged,
you can tell recon-all to skip the checking.
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 3 Nov 2
Hi, I'm analyzing fMRI data using freesurfer 5.0.0. I run into the following
error when running selxavg3-sess. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Eyal
*
edech...@
Hi Kristina,
You can find the answer to your question here:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/UserContributions/FAQ#Q.IgetanerrormessagefromtheTalairachFailureDetection.Whatdoesthismean.3F
As a new user, you might find that FAQ helpful.
Allison
--
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Rapuano, Kristina (N
Ah, the "white matter" volume computed from the pial-white includes the
subcortical structures. Once those are subtracted, you should get the #s
in the aseg.stats file.
doug
Ed Gronenschild wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> I checked the numbers again and found the difference:
>
> The last occurrence in th
Hello there,
I am fairly new to freesurfer, and received an error message that I am not sure
how to handle. I was running recon-all (-autorecon1 and -autorecon2) which then
quit with this error:
cp transforms/talairach.auto.xfm transforms/talairach.xfm
#
Hi Freesurfers,
I have created a binary mask of the ventricles using mri_binarize
using data from aparc+aseg.mgz. I want to resample this mask into
native functional space, but I want to include only functional voxels
that are 100% covered by by the structural mask. Because the
anatomica
Hi Doug,
I checked the numbers again and found the difference:
The last occurrence in the recon-all.log reads:
Getting Cerebral WM volumes from surface
lh white matter volume 251139
rh white matter volume 254730
Getting Cerebral GM and WM volumes from surfaces
lh surface-based volumes (mm3): wTo
Dear FreeSurfers,
The noconform flag of mri_normalize doesnt seem to work properly in the
centos4_x86_64_stable-pub-v5.0.0 build. I have been trying to process a
volume with an isotropic resolution of 0.7mm using
recon-all cm autorecon1 s
as the command line. The conformation is s
17 matches
Mail list logo