Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer Digest, Vol 78, Issue 18

2010-08-16 Thread Bruce Fischl
and mri_morphology which has a dilation operator in it On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Douglas Greve wrote: > you can also use mri_binarize which has a --dilate option. I think it > dilates if it has one or more faces in common. You might also look into > fslmaths (you can easily convert from mgz to nifti)

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer Digest, Vol 78, Issue 18

2010-08-16 Thread Douglas Greve
you can also use mri_binarize which has a --dilate option. I think it dilates if it has one or more faces in common. You might also look into fslmaths (you can easily convert from mgz to nifti) if that's an issue On 8/16/10 8:46 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > you are welcome to our sou

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer Digest, Vol 78, Issue 18

2010-08-16 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Jeff, you are welcome to our source code which has region-growing algorithms in the volume (e.g. for control point detection) and on the surface. cheers Bruce On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Eriksen, Jeffrey (Portland) wrote: > Bruce, > > Yes, you are likely correct, but my boss wants to do it this w

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer Digest, Vol 78, Issue 18

2010-08-16 Thread Eriksen, Jeffrey (Portland)
Bruce, Yes, you are likely correct, but my boss wants to do it this way. Besides, I am going to have other uses for region growing that you might find scientifically acceptable. But the question still stands - does Freesurfer give me access to such a basic tool, or will I have to write my own with

Re: [Freesurfer] Curvature of the Corpus Callosum

2010-08-16 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Alan, which curvature index do you mean? Bruce On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Alan Francis wrote: > Hi All: > > Does a lower score on the curvature index of the CC (as done by FreeSurfer) > imply that the Corpus Callosum is more curved (smaller radius) or is it the > other way around? > > > thank you,

Re: [Freesurfer] New v5.0.0 release

2010-08-16 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Nick, On Aug 16, 2010, at 14:47 , Nick Schmansky wrote: > sebastian, > > snow leopard has given us a number of headaches in the freesurfer gui > department, and it may take a while to sort them out. the gray scale > issue is one of them. freeview not working is another. Ah, too ba

Re: [Freesurfer] preserving control points and wm edits

2010-08-16 Thread Douglas N Greve
you don't need to do anything special. Version 5 will see the edits and keep them (though it is a good idea to back up your data just in case:). Mira Michelle Raman wrote: > Hi, > I want to re-run subjects in 5.0 that have been > edited in 4.5(wm.mgz, brainmask.mgz, control points). > > Wha

[Freesurfer] preserving control points and wm edits

2010-08-16 Thread Mira Michelle Raman
Hi, I want to re-run subjects in 5.0 that have been edited in 4.5(wm.mgz, brainmask.mgz, control points). What command should I use to preserve these edits? -Mira ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harva

Re: [Freesurfer] New v5.0.0 release

2010-08-16 Thread Nick Schmansky
sebastian, snow leopard has given us a number of headaches in the freesurfer gui department, and it may take a while to sort them out. the gray scale issue is one of them. freeview not working is another. n. On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 11:35 -0700, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi Nick, > > pretty coo

Re: [Freesurfer] New v5.0.0 release

2010-08-16 Thread Douglas N Greve
There is a new retinotopic mapping stream. I have not fully documented it yet. You now analyze the retinotopy data like you would other functional analysis in fsfast. First create an "analysis" with mkanalysis-sess. Run it with -help to get info on retinotopy-specific parameters. Eg, # Create

Re: [Freesurfer] New v5.0.0 release

2010-08-16 Thread Yuhong Jiang
This is very nice. I just tried to do an analysis in the new release under Mac OS X (10.6.4, Intel). However, retinotopic mapping would not run. I did "sfa-sess -a rtopy -sf sessid -df sessdir". The error message says "sfa-sess: Command not found." Any idea why this is the case? Thanks. -Yuhong O

Re: [Freesurfer] Curvature of the Corpus Callosum

2010-08-16 Thread Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
It's almost flat. So the radius is very large. - Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior Diretor de Operações Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom -- www.netfilter.com.br -- For mobile: http://www.netfilter.com.br/mobile On Mon, Aug

[Freesurfer] Curvature of the Corpus Callosum

2010-08-16 Thread Alan Francis
Hi All: Does a lower score on the curvature index of the CC (as done by FreeSurfer) imply that the Corpus Callosum is more curved (smaller radius) or is it the other way around? thank you, Alan |~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~| Alan Francis Brain Spectroscopy and Neuroimaging La

Re: [Freesurfer] New v5.0.0 release: rerun an already processed datasets

2010-08-16 Thread Nick Schmansky
yes, but dont mix results from different versions if conducting a group study. n. On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 21:29 +0200, Diederick Stoffers wrote: > Hi all, > > > Can I simply rerun recon-all -s -all on datasets already processed in > a previous version? > > > Cheers, > > > Diederick > > > >

Re: [Freesurfer] Cluster Correction in Freesurfer

2010-08-16 Thread Douglas N Greve
Try mri_surfcluster doug Pye, Brandon (NIH/NIMH) [F] wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question about performing a cluster correction. I have gone through > the Group Analysis tutorial on the FsTutorial website, but it walks through > the process of doing a glm analysis to compare different conditi

[Freesurfer] Cluster Correction in Freesurfer

2010-08-16 Thread Pye, Brandon (NIH/NIMH) [F]
Hi all, I have a question about performing a cluster correction. I have gone through the Group Analysis tutorial on the FsTutorial website, but it walks through the process of doing a glm analysis to compare different conditions of data. I have a mask file (.mgh) that contains activation leve

Re: [Freesurfer] New v5.0.0 release: rerun an already processed datasets

2010-08-16 Thread Diederick Stoffers
Hi all, Can I simply rerun recon-all -s -all on datasets already processed in a previous version? Cheers, Diederick On 16 aug 2010, at 18:04, Nick Schmansky wrote: > Announcement! > > There is a new release of FreeSurfer, v5.0.0! > > Features and fixes are described in the ReleaseNotes pag

Re: [Freesurfer] New v5.0.0 release

2010-08-16 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Nick, pretty cool. It looks like this is the real deal :). I noticed something weird on macosx 10.6.4 (x86_64 kernel). The simple inflated surgace is not rendered smoothly but shows recognizable steps in the gray values. Attached an png showing the effect (I hope this is small enough to make

[Freesurfer] New v5.0.0 release

2010-08-16 Thread Nick Schmansky
Announcement! There is a new release of FreeSurfer, v5.0.0! Features and fixes are described in the ReleaseNotes page: http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ReleaseNotes It is available for download at: http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/DownloadAndInstall Please pose questions about

Re: [Freesurfer] question regarding minimum p-values in cortical thickness

2010-08-16 Thread Douglas N Greve
Mike is correct. Thanks Mike! doug Michael Waskom wrote: > Hi Heidi, > > You can use mri_segstats on the surface. You can either use the > --label option or, if you have a lot of labels, you can merge them > into an annotation with mris_label2annot and then use the --annot > option to extract

Re: [Freesurfer] question regarding minimum p-values in cortical thickness

2010-08-16 Thread Michael Waskom
Hi Heidi, You can use mri_segstats on the surface. You can either use the --label option or, if you have a lot of labels, you can merge them into an annotation with mris_label2annot and then use the --annot option to extract from all at once (values are extracted from each region separately; this

[Freesurfer] question regarding minimum p-values in cortical thickness

2010-08-16 Thread Jacobs H (NP)
Hi, Last year, I have been working for four months with David Salat and so, I have learnt a lot, including the dt_recon command. >From David, I also learnt to use mri_segstats command in order to get minimum >p-values for each label in my volume. However, now I have performed cortical thickness