Hi Jon,
what statistical tests are you running? That defines what the bonferroni
correction will be. For example, if you are testing for thickness
differences in each parcellation unit, then you need to correct for the #
of parcels.
cheers,
Bruce
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jonathan
DuBois wrote:
When correcting for multiple comparisons with Bonferroni for FS parcilation
statistics, is it necessary to adjust for all parcellations (35) or just the
variables (in our case mean thickness and surface area)? Assuming that no
prior hypothesis is used to constrain the number of parcellations.
Than
Hi Guang,
it depends what you want. The .gcs file is what we use to generate the
automated parcellations. It needs to match the registration that you used
to build your template, so the parcellation may not work well for you
with your own template
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Guang Zeng w
Hello, there,
I built our own template, and gonna use it to test some subjects.
Currently, I have two questions,
(1) How can I use my template,
In "recon-all.sh", I found that their two places where
?h.average.curvature.filled.buckner40.tif are called,
so I just need to change all the "?h.a
Hi,
this usually happens when the RAS center is incorrect in your data. It
is not really a bug, but we prepared a version that does not use the
ras coordinates but the center of mass instead for initial alignment.
What operating system are you running?
Cheers Martin
On Nov 20, 2009, at 8:2
yup, looks like a bug. Can you arrange to send the data to Martin?
thanks
Bruce
On Fri,
20 Nov 2009, Hui Zheng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a problem in longitudinal processing. The mri_robust_template
> somehow chopped off a part of the brain (attached image). Any idea how to
> correct this? Wi
