Hi Sky,
this means that the aseg voxel that corresponds to the interior of the
?h.white surface has been computed to be outside the aseg volume, which
definitely means something is wrong. Can you tar up one subject like this
(without the 6G of error messages!) and we'll take a look?
thanks,
This is a very strange and amusing issue that is occurring with a
population of subjects that I ran previously on version 3.0.5 and am now
rerunning on version 4.0.4. The subjects are finishing recon-all with no
errors after substantially longer than usual, because the mri_segstats
script appears
Hi Amy,
this line:
before topology correction, eno=-2256 (nv=163798, nf=332108, ne=498162, g=1129)
using quasi-homeomorphic spherical map to tessellate cortical surface...
in your log file means something is dramatically wrong. Specically the
Euler Number (eno) is *way* to negative. Check to s
Hi, I have some subjects that stop to run autorecon-all at mri_fix_topology with no error message, as following:-- CORRECTING DEFECT 75 (vertices=410, convex hull=299)After retessellation of defect 75, euler #=95 (83637,238222,154680) : difference with theory (-54) =
FreeSurfer users,
We are looking for new and experienced brain imagers wanting to work in
our UCSF-affiliated research lab.
Please apply at the following link if interested:
http://www.ncire.org/positions.php?id=145
thank you,
Brian
___
Freesurfer
Hi Juergen,
I didn't know there was a "restCSF". I wouldn't trust the CSF label in
general from just a T1 image though. The ventricles are quite accurate, but
that's based on context that isn't available for the sulcal CSF.
cheers,
Bruce
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Juergen Haenggi wrote:
Dear F
Dear FS experts
In the aseg file there are several CSF labels. Does the term "csf" mean
sulcal CSF of both cerebral hemispheres, and does the term "restCSF" mean
CSF in cisterns?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Juergen
---
Juergen Haenggi
Ph
