[Freesurfer] Parcellation Protocol?

2008-03-27 Thread Raymond Hill
Hello, We are trying to compare FreeSurfer's parcellation with what we do here manually. To that end, we were wondering if we could access a detailed protocol that was used to manually create the ROIs that went into the FS Parcellation atlas? We have examined the Desikan et al (2006) pa

Re: [Freesurfer] purpose of creating own "average subject"

2008-03-27 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Mike, imagine you had only on subject your study. Then using the buckner atlas as an overlay (or fsaverage, which is kind of equivalent) would not be representative at all. If the registration works perfectly and you have a fair number of subjects then there probably isn't much difference,

Re: [Freesurfer] purpose of creating own "average subject"

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Harms
Hi Bruce, Re your 2nd point: My assumption was that very few FS users are actually creating their own atlases. To do that you need to do (much) more than just run make_average_subject, right? (Namely, create your own .gcs file for annotations, and .tif for registration, correct? And isn't that

Re: [Freesurfer] purpose of creating own "average subject"

2008-03-27 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Mike, a couple of things. One is that creating your own average will give you a better ability to see what the true anatomical localization of your effects are. Another is that you can re-register your subjects to your own atlas, and possibly obtain better registration, particularly if your

[Freesurfer] purpose of creating own "average subject"

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Harms
Hello, There have been numerous posts recently related to the creation of a study specific "average subject". I have a question about the purpose/motivation of this for surface-stream analysis/visualization that I was hoping someone could clarify. Specifically, my understanding is that the annot

Re: [Freesurfer] Talairach transformation

2008-03-27 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Thomas, have you visually inspected the talairach.xfm file? This error means that the parameters of the transform fall far enough outside the normal range that it is suspicious. You can rerun with -notal-check if you are sure it is correct, but you should check and possibly fix it. cheers

[Freesurfer] variables and glmfit...

2008-03-27 Thread Cameron Ellis
Hi all, I have two questions regarding glmfit and testing for effects of different variables. I have four groups. When testing for effects of age across all of the groups, will there be a difference when assigning each group a class in my fsgd file, with age as a variable, like so: Class PH Class