Hi Greg,
nothing in the very short term, but it is on our list.
Bruce
On Wed, 2 May 2007,
Kirk, Gregory wrote:
Hi,
If I did a good job looking through the maillist archive the use of
scans with resolution
less than 1mm is not handled automatically yet, i.e. have to manually
normalize ( div
Hi all,
I've installed freesurfer 3.0.5 SuSE linux version, on a supercomputer,
modified the setup .csh file and am getting the following errors.
mri_convert: error while loading shared libraries: libjpeg.so.62: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
I've included the follo
Mike,
After some investigation, I've updated the ReleaseNotes page again with
more accurate details on this bug (which is in v3.0.5 and all prior
versions). See the Known Issues section of v3.0.5:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ReleaseNotes
If accurate measures of 'average integrated
Hi,
If I did a good job looking through the maillist archive the use of
scans with resolution
less than 1mm is not handled automatically yet, i.e. have to manually
normalize ( divide ) quantities so
the numbers are correct. Since we can only get a tiny bit less than 1mm
( 0.9mm ) for patient scan
Copy these into your freesurfer bin
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/make_average_surface
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/make_average_subject
then run with --no-link
doug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Doug,
I am also running FS on a
You can run mris_convert to convert them to ascii, or you can read them
into matlab with read_curv, or you can convert them to nifti with
mri_convert lh.thickness lh.thickness.nii
doug
Inês Souta wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to freesurfer and I'd like to know how I can have access to
the numerical va
Hi Nick,
Is this "bug" specific to v3.0.5? Because when I specify white vs. pial
surfaces as options under v3.0.4, I do get different
values for the curvature measures, leading me to think the option works fine under v3.0.4 ??
Also, could you please clarify whether the default surface for
'mr
Mike,
I've updated the release notes to be more specific (and less alarming!)
on the problem found with mris_anatomical_stats. The new notes state:
"mris_anatomical_stats effectively ignores the command
line argument when reporting on its curvature measures, and will always
report on the pial s
Hi Mike,
mris_wm_volume does what you describe. It generates a high resolution
volume of the interior of the ?h.white surface, then counts up all the
voxels internal to that that are labeled White Matter or Cortex by the
aseg (that is, we trust the surface placement more than the aseg.mgz, so
Hello,
The FS release notes for v3.0.5 state:
"mris_anatomical_stats produces incorrect results. There is no work-
around. A replacement for Linux is here. This fix will appear in the
next release."
Is the entire output of 'mris_anatomical_stats' incorrect, or just one
part of it? And, does the
Hello List,
Just to clarify: I thought that the "total white matter volume"
statistic that is output as part of 'mris_anatomical_stats' is incorrect
and not to be used. Rather, I thought 'mris_wm_volume' was to be used
instead...
Also, while I'm posting on this issue, could someone please comm
Hi Doug,
I am also running FS on a virtual machine and encoutered the same problem
with the symbolic links that is described below. When I run the
make_average_subject script only data for the right hemisphere is created.
Then it seems to stop with the message:
ln: creating symbolic link `rh.sphe
Hi,
I'm new to freesurfer and I'd like to know how I can have access to
the numerical values of the cortical thickness of an average subject.
Thanks.
Inês
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mai
13 matches
Mail list logo
