Sorry, I think I gave you some incorrect info. Try this instead:
tkregister2 --targ bold/004/fmc.bhdr --mov bold/009/fmc.bhdr --identity
--reg /tmp/junk.reg
I just added the --identity to tkregister2. I tried to look at your
data to verify that this was the problem, but it is sooo
Le
Hi Doug,
I tried the technique you suggested for re-sampling functional volumes
from different sessions but from the same subject (and scanner) into the
same space, using mc-sess.
To clarify, here we have a situation where the same brain is scanned in
the same scanner on more than one occasion (i
Actually, this is still a good question. I took great pains to make
sure that the surfaces were in registration with the MNI305, and I'm
assuming that this will make the the tal coords match up better. But I
never actually sat down and checked various areas against the
talairach atlas. Nick might
ignore previous email - the README file answers my question - yes.
sorry, thnx, f
On Monday, March 6, 2006, at 06:12 PM, Doug Greve wrote:
Sorry in advance for the long email ...
We have a new average subject that we are recommending that people use
instead of "average7". This subject can also
hi doug
this is unrelated to the usage of fsaverage, but i was wondering if the
talairach coordinates of this average subject are more compatible with
the talairach map than those of average7. thanks, frida
On Monday, March 6, 2006, at 06:12 PM, Doug Greve wrote:
Sorry in advance for the long
