Hi Geoffrey,
if you can put the data somewhere we can get to it someone here will take
a look.
Bruce
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Geoffrey Aguirre wrote:
> Folks --
>
> I'm working with a dog brain. With the help of Denis Fize, I've
> "tricked" freesurfer into treating my 0.47 mm voxels as 1 m
Hi Akemi,
I'm not sure I agree that area and thickness can't be independent. You
could for example scale a spherical shell to be a smaller volume and area,
but a constant thickness. In any case, you can get the #s you want from
mris_anatomical stats:
mris_anatomical_stats $subject $hemi white
Dear list,
According to the results by running FS in our subjects, I have come to
realize that the cortical surface area and gray-matter volume shrinks, while
the cortical thickness tends to increase with a highly localized area of
cortical thickening in the left hemisphere.
To my knowledge, thes
Folks --
I'm working with a dog brain. With the help of Denis Fize, I've
"tricked" freesurfer into treating my 0.47 mm voxels as 1 mm voxels,
and I have manually stripped the skull. I used the automated routine to
segment white matter and then manually erased the brainstem and
cerebellum. Now,
Hi Fred,
we haven't released it yet, as it still requires a fair amount of
attention to run properly, and I don't want people generating poor results
and thinking it doesn't work well (which it does!). We are trying to figure
out a schedule for release now though.
Bruce
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004,
Hi all
are there any plans to release the subcortical parcellation as part of
freesurfer? Or is it in another set of tools? Or is it still in-house
only?
Thanks!
Fred
___
Freesurfer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman