I guess we could have made it mandatory to specify one. There's no
benefit, it just provides different information (presumably less sensitive
to atrophy, which could be good or bad depending on your interest)
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Keyma Prince wrote:
> Is there any benefit to using the white su
Is there any benefit to using the white surface for surface area. Why is
that the default?
-Keyma
Keyma Prince
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
NE20-392
Cambridge, MA 02139
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> yes, the surface you specify on
yes, the surface you specify only matters for surface area.
Bruce
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Keyma Prince wrote:
> So when you run it with the default ?h.white surface then it is computing
> the surface area of white matter? I'm confused then on what it is
> computing for the thickness, is this still
So when you run it with the default ?h.white surface then it is computing
the surface area of white matter? I'm confused then on what it is
computing for the thickness, is this still the distance between the gray
and white matter?
-Keyma
Keyma Prince
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Departme
Hey Keyma,
the default surface is ?h.white. You can specify a different one (such as
pial) by including it as the 3rd command line argument.
cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Keyma Prince wrote:
> When you look at the values that are produced by mris_anatomical_stats for
> surface area, are t
When you look at the values that are produced by mris_anatomical_stats for
surface area, are these values the same as pial surface area?
Is the pial surface the same as the inflated surface?
-Keyma
___
Freesurfer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ma
