[Freeipa-users] Questions regarding AD Forest integration

2024-05-04 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
Our production IPA servers are currently at ipa-server-4.9.12-11.module+el8.9.0+20824+f2605038.x86_64. (Planning is underway to migrate to new RHEL 9.3 servers.) We have a 1-way trust established with AD. All active users are in AD with the POSIX attributes defined. Overall, this has worked well. H

[Freeipa-users] IPA sub-domain in a lab?

2023-08-09 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
We currently use (Free)IPA (what's provided by Redhat) in a forest trust relationship with our Active Directory domains. All accounts are defined in AD with the necessary POSIX attributes. The only things locally defined within IPA are the automounter maps, sudo rules, and HBAC rules. (I must say,

[Freeipa-users] Re: PacRequestorEnforcement and CVE-2021-42287, any concern?

2022-03-21 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:44 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On ma, 21 maalis 2022, Amos via FreeIPA-users wrote: > > >https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6633491 which isn't very encouraging. > > This one is unrelated. RHEL 8.4+ should have enough fixes. > > Do yo

[Freeipa-users] PacRequestorEnforcement and CVE-2021-42287, any concern?

2022-03-21 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
Hi. I'm trying to find out if the changes to PacRequestorEnforcement in order to remedy CVE-2021-42287 will have an impact on IPA servers/clients. Our IPA servers are in a one-way trust with AD. All user accounts are in AD. I've tried to lookup anything related to this, but not finding much. Wh

[Freeipa-users] broken replication between multi-master nodes

2021-05-29 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
We have a mutli-master configuration between two servers, ca-master1, and rep1. It was discovered that there were some replication failures with some records. We were instructed to clear these failed replication events by doing the following. # ldapdelete -x -h localhost -D 'cn=Directory Manage

[Freeipa-users] Re: How far I can take the use of short unqualified names/groups with an AD integrated FreeIPA setup?

2020-10-30 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 8:04 PM Louis Abel via FreeIPA-users < freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org> wrote: > > > * Like in the comments, don't add that on the IPA server's sssd.conf, only > to the clients enrolled to the IPA domain. > * I cannot remember if it also drops the @domain for the group

[Freeipa-users] hide domain of AD users on Solaris clients?

2020-10-30 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
Our IPA servers are in a one-way AD trust. Since all of our users are in AD, I take advantage of the SSSD settings on the clients to hide the @AD_REALM from their login names, and use AD_REALM as the default_realm. This works nicely. Solaris clients, however, do not have the convenience of SSSD.

[Freeipa-users] Re: automember hostgroup by account?

2020-06-14 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
Thanks! On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 2:55 AM Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote: > > Hi, > > 389-ds implemented a new feature that allows to run the automembership > plugin on modify operations as well as on add operations. For more > information, please refer to the feature design [1] and 389-ds ticket > 5

[Freeipa-users] Re: automember hostgroup by account?

2020-06-11 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
Sorry to follow-up to an old thread, but is this still true? https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-users/2015-February/msg00038.html On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 9:45 AM Rob Crittenden wrote: > Amos via FreeIPA-users wrote: > > Is it possible to have an automember rule to add a

[Freeipa-users] IPA client as a Samba server?

2020-01-21 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
So, was told a RHEL IPA client (leveraging sssd) could not also be a Samba server (leveraging winbindd) because sssd and winbindd collide in terms of the Kerberos bindings. Our IPA servers are configured in "compat" mode in expectation of having to support a few Solaris systems. Could I configure

[Freeipa-users] Re: Strange krb5 issue

2020-01-21 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
no dice [root@aisffcgi08 ~]# kinit admin Password for ad...@ipa.x.org: [root@aisffcgi08 ~]# ipa-getkeytab -s ipasrv01.ipa.x.org -k /etc/krb5.keytab -p host/ipasrv01.ipa.x.org Keytab successfully retrieved and stored in: /etc/krb5.keytab [root@aisffcgi08 ~]# klist -kte Keytab name: FILE:/etc/

[Freeipa-users] Re: Strange krb5 issue

2020-01-16 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
Oddly enough, I'm experiencing this on one of our IPA clients as well. However, I have some questions... On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 12:25 PM Alexander Bokovoy via FreeIPA-users < freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org> wrote: > > The in-memory keytab is something SSSD copies the keys from > /etc/krb5.k

[Freeipa-users] valid hostname?

2019-10-23 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
When enrolling a host, an error was presented: root: INFO Joining realm failed: RPC failed at server. invalid 'hostname': invalid domain-name: only letters, numbers, '-' are allowed. DNS label may not start or end with '-' Where does this error originate from? Is it truly impossible

[Freeipa-users] Re: automember hostgroup by account?

2019-09-25 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 9:45 AM Rob Crittenden wrote: > > Using enrolledBy in the inclusive regex should do it. > > Thanks! Are Inclusive conditions logically "AND", or are they logical "OR"? Amos ___ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.

[Freeipa-users] hostgroups and netgroups

2019-09-21 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
Why is it that hostgroups and netgroups share the same name space? Amos ___ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://doc

[Freeipa-users] automember hostgroup by account?

2019-09-19 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
Is it possible to have an automember rule to add a host to a hostgroup based on the account used with ipa-install-client? Amos ___ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@list

[Freeipa-users] Re: seeking advice, especially from universities....

2018-02-06 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Jakub Hrozek via FreeIPA-users < freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org> wrote: > > If you don't want to bother with the POSIX attributes on the AD side, > you can perhaps use ID overrides? See > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ > enterprise_linu

[Freeipa-users] seeking advice, especially from universities....

2018-02-06 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
Apologies if this post is slightly off-topic, but I'd really like to pick some brains Currently, we have two, main LDAP directory environments: AD and a cluster of Solaris LDAP servers. The accounts are unified, and are managed via Microsoft Identity Manager (with a connector for updating Sol

[Freeipa-users] Domains/realms, yet again....

2017-10-11 Thread Amos via FreeIPA-users
I've been studying the docs, and googling the Internet pipes, but it seems our environment is particular twisted. We have hundreds of UNIX/Linux servers residing in the "x.org" DNS domain that have been using Sun LDAP servers for naming services and authentication. DNS for the servers in this "x.