[Freeipa-users] Re: Traffic from client to server through management's interface

2020-02-17 Thread Daniel PC via FreeIPA-users
I believe is an administrative policy that traffic not related to application should be routed by management's interface. Daniel ___ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@l

[Freeipa-users] Re: Traffic from client to server through management's interface

2020-02-17 Thread Robbie Harwood via FreeIPA-users
Daniel PC via FreeIPA-users writes: > I would like to know what do you think about using the management > network (eth1) to enable the flow from clients to IPA servers? My > company is concerned about using the production network interface > (eth0) and is considering doing everything on the secon

[Freeipa-users] Re: Issues with certificates: X509: KEY_VALUES_MISMATCH

2020-02-17 Thread Rob Crittenden via FreeIPA-users
Dmitri Moudraninets via FreeIPA-users wrote: > Hi Rob, > > > I was able to start my CA via instructions from here: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-users/2017-January/msg00215.html > > I also tried to set the clock back and restart certmonger. Still no luck: That seems to be a pretty g

[Freeipa-users] Re: Traffic from client to server through management's interface

2020-02-17 Thread Angus Clarke via FreeIPA-users
Not very helpful I realise but in my experience, moving away from multi-interfaced servers to single interface was the best thing we ever did. It took massive change in the tech department to do that but was well worth it with respect to reduced complexity. Regards Angus __

[Freeipa-users] Traffic from client to server through management's interface

2020-02-17 Thread Daniel PC via FreeIPA-users
I would like to know what do you think about using the management network (eth1) to enable the flow from clients to IPA servers? My company is concerned about using the production network interface (eth0) and is considering doing everything on the second interface. Is it worth it? Pros and cons

[Freeipa-users] Re: systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service and sssd

2020-02-17 Thread Rob Brown via FreeIPA-users
The solution/hack I came up with to get around this was to just let tmpfiles.d create the dir with a local user and open enough permissions that the ipa based user that the service runs as has enough permissions to write it's pid file into the directory. Not elegant, but works for now. /usr/lib/tmp

[Freeipa-users] Re: Authentication indicators smartcard, ssh and sudo

2020-02-17 Thread Leon Castellano via FreeIPA-users
Not sure why that line wrapped on the pam.d/sudo file: #%PAM-1.0 auth sufficient pam_ssh_agent_auth.so authorized_keys_command=/usr/bin/sss_ssh_authorizedkeys auth include system-auth account include system-auth password include system-auth session include system-auth

[Freeipa-users] Re: sss_ssh_authorizedkeys slow on IPA-server

2020-02-17 Thread Winfried de Heiden via FreeIPA-users
Hi all, After all, no issues at all with FreeIPA. The reboot of the Cable modem caused changing the IPv6 Prefix Delegation, more or less destroying my IPv6 setup. After fixing IPv6 (enabled on IPA also :) ) all is going blazing fast again. Winfried Op 11-02-2020 om 16:01 schreef Winfried de

[Freeipa-users] freeipa monitoring / 389ds_exporter

2020-02-17 Thread Jiri B via FreeIPA-users
Hi all, I'd like to monitor couple of FreeIPA servers with prometheus. What to use to monitor FreeIPA via prometheus? Any tips? I only found 389ds_exporter but's there's an error when it tries to get replica agreements. Otherwise it seems to return valid metrics. ~~~ ... DEBU[0020] getting repl