On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 15:31 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>
> The whole point of this work to decompose things and make them simpler.
> One command with dozens of options is much harder to use.
> I stand on my own point but we should ask community.
Lets see what the community would say about the API b
Hello all,
we just had a good discussion with Rob and Endi about different approach
to the new DNS API. Current DNS API proposal (patches 174-176)
introduced new API based on different commands, e.g. for MX RR type:
ipa dnsrecord-mx-add ZONE NAME --preference=0 --exchanger=server1.example.com.
ip
This patch adds the ipalib/session.py file which implements a cookie
based session cache using memcached.
It also invokes the session cookie support when a HTTP request is
received and stores the session data in the per-thread context object.
--
John Dennis
Looking to carve out IT costs?
ww
This patch adds an ipa memcached service, it does the following:
* adds SysV initscript for ipa_memcached
* adds systemd service file for ipa_memcached
* adds tmpfiles.d configuration file for /var/run/ipa_memcached
* adds configuration file for ipa_memcached
* adds memcacheinstance.py file t
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 12:43 -0600, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 12:53 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >> I found this works ok and adding records is definitely clearer but it
> >> seems odd to add with one command and delete/find with another. I could
> >> get used to it I suppose.
> >
> > Hm
On 12/14/2011 03:02 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 12/14/2011 01:43 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
>>> On 12/14/2011 12:53 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> I found this works ok and adding records is definitely clearer
> but it
> seems odd to add with one command an
- Original Message -
> On 12/14/2011 01:43 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> > On 12/14/2011 12:53 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> I found this works ok and adding records is definitely clearer
> >>> but it
> >>> seems odd to add with one command and delete/find with another. I
> >>> could
> >
- Original Message -
> On 12/14/2011 10:58 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > We can also generate the SID algorithmically from the
> > uidNumber/gidNumber
> Do you mean the SID of the trusted domain user?
> >>> No I meant the SID of users and groups.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Dmitri Pal wrote:
> >On 12/12/2011 07:15 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:22 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >>>This patch adds support for s4u2proxy. This means that the Apache
> >>>server
> >>>will obtain the ldap service ticket on be
Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 12/12/2011 07:15 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:22 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This patch adds support for s4u2proxy. This means that the Apache
server
will obtain the ldap service ticket on behalf of the user rather than
the using having to send their TGT.
On 12/14/2011 10:58 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> - Original Message -
> We can also generate the SID algorithmically from the
> uidNumber/gidNumber
Do you mean the SID of the trusted domain user?
>>> No I meant the SID of users and groups.
>> ok, I would very much favor this approac
On 12/14/2011 01:43 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 12:53 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> I found this works ok and adding records is definitely clearer but it
>>> seems odd to add with one command and delete/find with another. I could
>>> get used to it I suppose.
>>
>> Hm, we could add d
On 12/14/2011 12:53 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
I found this works ok and adding records is definitely clearer but it
seems odd to add with one command and delete/find with another. I could
get used to it I suppose.
Hm, we could add dnsrecord--del ZONE RECORD VALUE command, but this
would increase
- Original Message -
> > > > We can also generate the SID algorithmically from the
> > > > uidNumber/gidNumber
> > >
> > > Do you mean the SID of the trusted domain user?
> >
> > No I meant the SID of users and groups.
>
> ok, I would very much favor this approach it will make things muc
On 12/13/2011 3:49 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
1. The original code uses different background images for
active/inactive tabs. I think the mockup in the ticket is also showing
different backgrounds. The new code uses the same background.
Fixed, using the background from mockup - but honestly I don
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 14.12.2011 15:23, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 14.12.2011 05:20, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The sudo schema now defines sudoOrder, sudoNotBefore and sudoNotAfter
but these weren't available in the sudorule plugin.
I've added support for these. sudoO
Dne 14.12.2011 15:23, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 14.12.2011 05:20, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The sudo schema now defines sudoOrder, sudoNotBefore and sudoNotAfter
but these weren't available in the sudorule plugin.
I've added support for these. sudoOrder enforces uniquen
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 08:31:57AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 14:12 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 07:45:53AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 10:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:08:24PM +0200, Alexander B
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 14.12.2011 05:20, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The sudo schema now defines sudoOrder, sudoNotBefore and sudoNotAfter
but these weren't available in the sudorule plugin.
I've added support for these. sudoOrder enforces uniqueness because
duplicates are undefined.
I also add
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 14:12 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 07:45:53AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 10:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:08:24PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 07:45:53AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 10:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:08:24PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:27 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 10:23 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:08:24PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:27 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > > > --passwor
Dne 14.12.2011 05:20, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The sudo schema now defines sudoOrder, sudoNotBefore and sudoNotAfter
but these weren't available in the sudorule plugin.
I've added support for these. sudoOrder enforces uniqueness because
duplicates are undefined.
I also added support for a Gene
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:08:24PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:27 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > > > --password [type-spec
Dne 14.12.2011 07:53, Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 15:55 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 17:18 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 17:35 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
I have prepared a working prototype o
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:08:24PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:27 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > > --password [type-specific parameters]
> > > > >
> > > > > Creates a tr
26 matches
Mail list logo
