Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 00/11] drm/msm: A5XX preemption

2017-02-06 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 6 February 2017 at 17:59, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:39:28AM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: >> This initial series implements 4 ringbuffers to give sufficient coverage for >> the >> range of priority levels requested by the GLES and compute extensions. The >> targeted

Re: [Freedreno] [RFC PULL] Add Display Support for Qualcomm SDM845

2018-02-14 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Rob, On 13 February 2018 at 20:00, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Sean Paul wrote: >> Qualcomm has been working for the past few weeks on forward porting their >> downstream drm driver from 4.14 to mainline. Please consider this PR as a >> request for review, rather than

Re: [Freedreno] [RFC PULL] Add Display Support for Qualcomm SDM845

2018-02-14 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 14 February 2018 at 13:50, Sean Paul wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 07:22:53AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: >> > This one I guess you can't get around though. Can they still run from >> > the one plane

Re: [PATCH v2 25/25] drm/xlnx: Compute dumb-buffer sizes with drm_mode_size_dumb()

2025-01-16 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 10:35, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 11:03 AM Tomi Valkeinen > > wrote: > > > On the platforms I have been using (omap, tidss, xilinx, rcar) the dumb > > > buffers are the only buffe

Re: [PATCH v2 25/25] drm/xlnx: Compute dumb-buffer sizes with drm_mode_size_dumb()

2025-01-15 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 14:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > No disagreement there, we need CREATE_DUMB2. > > My point is that we have the current UAPI, and we have userspace using > it, but we don't have clear rules what the ioctl does with specific > parameters, and we don't document how it has to be u