Re: [PATCH 0/7] Preemption support for A7XX

2024-08-23 Thread neil . armstrong
On 15/08/2024 20:26, Antonino Maniscalco wrote: This series implements preemption for A7XX targets, which allows the GPU to switch to an higher priority ring when work is pushed to it, reducing latency for high priority submissions. This series enables L1 preemption with skip_save_restore which

Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/msm/A6xx: Implement preemption for A7XX targets

2024-08-23 Thread Connor Abbott
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:06 PM Akhil P Oommen wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 05:02:56PM +0100, Connor Abbott wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 9:09 PM Akhil P Oommen > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 08:26:14PM +0200, Antonino Maniscalco wrote: > > > > This patch implements pr

Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/msm/A6xx: Implement preemption for A7XX targets

2024-08-23 Thread Connor Abbott
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:21 AM Connor Abbott wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:06 PM Akhil P Oommen > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 05:02:56PM +0100, Connor Abbott wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 9:09 PM Akhil P Oommen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 08:

Re: [PATCH 0/7] Preemption support for A7XX

2024-08-23 Thread Connor Abbott
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 9:30 AM wrote: > > On 15/08/2024 20:26, Antonino Maniscalco wrote: > > This series implements preemption for A7XX targets, which allows the GPU to > > switch to an higher priority ring when work is pushed to it, reducing > > latency > > for high priority submissions. > > >

Re: [PATCH 0/7] Preemption support for A7XX

2024-08-23 Thread neil . armstrong
On 23/08/2024 11:54, Connor Abbott wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 9:30 AM wrote: On 15/08/2024 20:26, Antonino Maniscalco wrote: This series implements preemption for A7XX targets, which allows the GPU to switch to an higher priority ring when work is pushed to it, reducing latency for high p

Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Make pgtable walker more generic

2024-08-23 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:16:44AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > index f5d9fd1f45bf..b4bc358740e0 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > @@ -747,33 +747,31 @@ static phys_addr_

Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Re-use the pgtable walk for iova_to_phys

2024-08-23 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:16:45AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > From: Rob Clark > > Re-use the generic pgtable walk path. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark > --- > drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 73 +- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > diff --gi

Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Re-use the pgtable walk for iova_to_phys

2024-08-23 Thread Rob Clark
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 9:11 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:16:45AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > > From: Rob Clark > > > > Re-use the generic pgtable walk path. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark > > --- > > drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 73 +-

Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Make pgtable walker more generic

2024-08-23 Thread Rob Clark
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 9:09 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:16:44AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > > index f5d9fd1f45bf..b4bc358740e0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > > +++ b/drivers/