On 20.09.2023 16:40, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>On 20/09/2023 00:34, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
>> The drm-stats fdinfo tags made available to user space are drm-engine,
>> drm-cycles, drm-max-freq and drm-curfreq, one per job slot.
>>
>> This deviates from standard practice in other DRM drivers, where a s
On 20.09.2023 16:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
>On 20/09/2023 00:34, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
>> Some BO's might be mapped onto physical memory chunkwise and on demand,
>> like Panfrost's tiler heap. In this case, even though the
>> drm_gem_shmem_object page array might already be allocated, only a very
On 20.09.2023 16:32, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
>On 20/09/2023 00:34, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
>> The current implementation will try to pick the highest available size
>> display unit as soon as the BO size exceeds that of the previous
>> multiplier. That can lead to loss of precision in contexts of low
On 21.09.2023 11:14, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
>On 20/09/2023 16:32, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 20/09/2023 00:34, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
>> > The current implementation will try to pick the highest available size
>> > display unit as soon as the BO size exceeds that of the previous
>> > multiplie
e at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230922/202309221426.fb0fe750-oliver.s...@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
On 22/09/2023 11:57, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
On 20.09.2023 16:40, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/09/2023 00:34, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
The drm-stats fdinfo tags made available to user space are drm-engine,
drm-cycles, drm-max-freq and drm-curfreq, one per job slot.
This deviates from standard prac
On 22/09/2023 12:03, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
On 21.09.2023 11:14, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/09/2023 16:32, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/09/2023 00:34, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
The current implementation will try to pick the highest available size
display unit as soon as the BO size exceeds tha
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
funct
Hi,
This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming
implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible
array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses
bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array
indexing) and CO
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
funct
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
funct
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
funct
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
funct
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
funct
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
funct
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
funct
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 1:32 PM Kees Cook wrote:
>
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexin
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
funct
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 1:33 PM Kees Cook wrote:
>
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexin
On 8/29/2023 1:22 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 17:05:13 -0700
Jessica Zhang wrote:
Loosen the requirements for atomic and legacy commit so that, in cases
where pixel_source != FB, the commit can still go through.
This includes adding framebuffer NULL checks in other areas
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
Thanks!
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 10:32 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFI
On 9/22/23 11:32, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIF
On 9/22/23 11:32, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIF
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2023-09-19 02:50:12)
> On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 20:48, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9/15/2023 6:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Sat, 16 Sept 2023 at 00:38, Kuogee Hsieh
> > > wrote:
> > >> Add pm_runtime_force_suspend()/resume() to complete incorporating pm
On 9/22/23 11:32, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIF
On 9/15/2023 5:29 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sat, 16 Sept 2023 at 00:38, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
Currently the dp_display_irq_handler() is executed at msm_dp_modeset_init()
which ties irq registration to the DPU device's life cycle, while depending on
resources that are released as the DP dev
Hi Stephen
On 9/22/2023 2:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2023-09-19 02:50:12)
On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 20:48, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 9/15/2023 6:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sat, 16 Sept 2023 at 00:38, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
Add pm_runtime_force_suspend()/resume()
On 9/22/23 11:32, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIF
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 10:32 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexin
29 matches
Mail list logo
