Fix undefined symbols errors arising from 64-bit division on 32-bit
arm targets. Add 64-bit version of mult_frac and use it for calculating
bandwidth.
ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_ldivmod" [drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm.ko] undefined
The SC7280 SoC uses the 7nm (V4.1) DSI PHY driver.
Signed-off-by: Rajeev Nandan
---
Changes in v2:
- New
This patch depends on [1] (dt-bindings: msm: dsi: add missing 7nm bindings)
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20210617144349.28448-2-jonat...@marek.ca/
Documentation/devicetree/
Add support for v2.5.0 DSI block in the SC7280 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Rajeev Nandan
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
---
(no changes since v1)
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c | 20
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drive
Changes in this series add support for MSM display DSI CTRL & PHY drivers
for the SC7280 SoC, which has DSI controller v2.5.0 and DSI PHY v4.1.
Changes in v2:
- Dropped patch #1 (dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Add yaml schema for 7nm DSI PHY) and
reused Jonathan's patch [1] (dt-bindings: msm: dsi: add mi
The SC7280 SoC uses the 7nm (V4.1) DSI PHY driver with
different enable|disable regulator loads.
Signed-off-by: Rajeev Nandan
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
---
Changes in v2:
- Fixed clang warning for max_pll_rate as per [1] (Dmitry Baryshkov)
- Fixed num_dsi_phy and io_start (Dmitry Baryshkov)
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:42 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 08:34:51AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 3:01 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rajeev
> > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 04:10:30PM +0530, Rajeev Nandan wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:38 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > > I cannot see why you need the extra check on ->enabled?
> > > Would it be sufficient to check backlight_is_blank() only?
> >
> > This extra check on bl->enabled flag is added to avoid enabling/disabling
> > backlight again if it is
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-06-18 14:41:50)
> On Fri 18 Jun 15:49 CDT 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-06-10 09:54:05)
> > > On 2021-06-08 16:10, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > On Tue 08 Jun 17:44 CDT 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Honestly I suspect
On Tue 22 Jun 15:23 CDT 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-06-18 14:41:50)
> > On Fri 18 Jun 15:49 CDT 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > > Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-06-10 09:54:05)
> > > > On 2021-06-08 16:10, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > > On Tue 08 Jun 17:44 CD
Hi,
On 23-06-2021 00:03, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:38 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > I cannot see why you need the extra check on ->enabled?
> > Would it be sufficient to check backlight_is_blank() only?
>
> This extra check on bl->enabled flag is added to avoid enablin
10 matches
Mail list logo
