Re: [PATCH 35/45] drm/msm/dp: add a mst session mutex to protect bridge ops

2024-12-08 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 08:32:06PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > To protect against concurrent access of the dp mst bridges > introduce a session mutex. Why is it necessary? What kind of concurrent access is expected? Why wasn't it introduced together with struct msm_dp_mst? > > Signed-off-by:

[PATCH 35/45] drm/msm/dp: add a mst session mutex to protect bridge ops

2024-12-05 Thread Abhinav Kumar
To protect against concurrent access of the dp mst bridges introduce a session mutex. Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_mst_drm.c | 20 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_mst_drm.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp