On 25/02/10 05:41AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 10:32:33PM -0500, Ethan Carter Edwards wrote:
> > There is a possibility for an uninitialized *ret* variable to be
> > returned in some code paths.
> >
> > Fix this by initializing *ret* to 0.
> >
> > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 16
There is a possibility for an uninitialized *ret* variable to be
returned in some code paths.
Fix this by initializing *ret* to 0.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1642546 ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
Fixes: 774bcfb731765d ("drm/msm/dpu: add support for virtual planes")
Signed-off-by: Ethan Carter Edw
On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 10:32:33PM -0500, Ethan Carter Edwards wrote:
> There is a possibility for an uninitialized *ret* variable to be
> returned in some code paths.
>
> Fix this by initializing *ret* to 0.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1642546 ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
> Fixes: 774bcfb731
