On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 08:24:07AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 08:24:07AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > O
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 20
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 05
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The vmwgfx ones l
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > >
> > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Sch
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> >
> > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
> > > That said, they were already signed o
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>
> > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
> > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure what
> > happened here.
>
> Ye
On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
> That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure what
> happened here.
Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a reason.
Since I
The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure what
happened here.
Roland
On 03.03.21 14:42, Lee Jones wrote:
> This is a resend. All of these patches have been sent before.
>
> The vmwgfx ones wer
This is a resend. All of these patches have been sent before.
The vmwgfx ones were even applied, but were dropped for some reason.
Lee Jones (53):
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init: Demote obvious abuse of kernel-doc
drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp: Remove unused variable 'ret'
drm/msm/dp/dp_dis
11 matches
Mail list logo