On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Vivek Gautam
wrote:
>>> +static int arm_smmu_init_clks(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>> +{
>>> + int i;
>>> + int num = smmu->num_clks;
>>> + const struct arm_smmu_match_data *data;
>>> +
>>> + if (num < 1)
>>> + return 0;
>>>
Hi Vivek,
Thanks for the patch. Please see some comments inline.
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM, Vivek Gautam
wrote:
> From: Sricharan R
>
> The smmu needs to be functional only when the respective
> master's using it are active. The device_link feature
> helps to track such functional dependen
Hi Tomasz,
Please find my response inline below.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> Thanks for the patch. Please see some comments inline.
>
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM, Vivek Gautam
> wrote:
>> From: Sricharan R
>>
>> The smmu needs to be functional only
From: Sricharan R
The smmu needs to be functional only when the respective
master's using it are active. The device_link feature
helps to track such functional dependencies, so that the
iommu gets powered when the master device enables itself
using pm_runtime. So by adapting the smmu driver for
r