On 2022-10-04 17:29:32, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 19:00, Marijn Suijten
> wrote:
> > [..]
> > For sm6125 we also need this exact io_start (and a single PHY), do you
> > think it makes sense to add a compatible that reuses the same struct (I
> > can do that in a folloup patch)
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 19:00, Marijn Suijten
wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-24 15:19:00, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > From: Loic Poulain
> >
> > The QCM2290 SoC a the 14nm (V2.0) single DSI phy. The platform is not
> > fully compatible with the standard 14nm PHY, so it requires a separate
> > compatible and
On 2022-09-24 15:19:00, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> From: Loic Poulain
>
> The QCM2290 SoC a the 14nm (V2.0) single DSI phy. The platform is not
> fully compatible with the standard 14nm PHY, so it requires a separate
> compatible and config entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain
> [DB: rebased a
On 24.09.2022 14:19, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> From: Loic Poulain
>
> The QCM2290 SoC a the 14nm (V2.0) single DSI phy. The platform is not
> fully compatible with the standard 14nm PHY, so it requires a separate
> compatible and config entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain
> [DB: rebased a
From: Loic Poulain
The QCM2290 SoC a the 14nm (V2.0) single DSI phy. The platform is not
fully compatible with the standard 14nm PHY, so it requires a separate
compatible and config entry.
Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain
[DB: rebased and updated commit msg]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
---
dri
