On 8/17/2023 12:27 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 8/17/2023 11:50 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 08/08/2023 02:49, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 6/4/2023 7:45 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
The atomic_mode_set() callback only sets the phys_enc's IRQ data. As
the
INTF and WB are statically allocate
On 8/17/2023 11:50 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 08/08/2023 02:49, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 6/4/2023 7:45 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
The atomic_mode_set() callback only sets the phys_enc's IRQ data. As the
INTF and WB are statically allocated to each encoder/phys_enc, drop the
atomic_mode
On 08/08/2023 02:49, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 6/4/2023 7:45 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
The atomic_mode_set() callback only sets the phys_enc's IRQ data. As the
INTF and WB are statically allocated to each encoder/phys_enc, drop the
atomic_mode_set callback and set the IRQs during encoder init.
On 6/4/2023 7:45 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
The atomic_mode_set() callback only sets the phys_enc's IRQ data. As the
INTF and WB are statically allocated to each encoder/phys_enc, drop the
atomic_mode_set callback and set the IRQs during encoder init.
For the CMD panel usecase some of IRQ in
The atomic_mode_set() callback only sets the phys_enc's IRQ data. As the
INTF and WB are statically allocated to each encoder/phys_enc, drop the
atomic_mode_set callback and set the IRQs during encoder init.
For the CMD panel usecase some of IRQ indexes depend on the selected
resources. Move setti
