On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 08:40:12PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 5:44 PM Hillf Danton wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:17:01 Kristian H. Kristensen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:02 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:24:19PM +0800,
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 20:40:12 Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 5:44 PM Hillf Danton wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:17:01 Kristian H. Kristensen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:02 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:24:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 5:44 PM Hillf Danton wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:17:01 Kristian H. Kristensen wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:02 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:24:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:21:45
> > > >
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:17:01 Kristian H. Kristensen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:02 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:24:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:21:45
> > > > From: Rob Clark
> > > >
> > > > Now that the inactive_list is pr
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 6:49 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:02 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:24:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:21:45
> > > > From: Rob Clark
> > > >
> > > > Now that the inactive_list is protected b
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:02 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:24:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:21:45
> > > From: Rob Clark
> > >
> > > Now that the inactive_list is protected by mm_lock, and everything
> > > else on per-obj basis is protected
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:02 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:24:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:21:45
> > > From: Rob Clark
> > >
> > > Now that the inactive_list is protected by mm_lock, and everything
> > > else on per-obj basis is protected
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:21:45
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Now that the inactive_list is protected by mm_lock, and everything
> else on per-obj basis is protected by obj->lock, we no longer depend
> on struct_mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 1 -
>
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:24:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:21:45
> > From: Rob Clark
> >
> > Now that the inactive_list is protected by mm_lock, and everything
> > else on per-obj basis is protected by obj->lock, we no longer depend
> > on struct_mutex.
> >
> > Sig
From: Rob Clark
Now that the inactive_list is protected by mm_lock, and everything
else on per-obj basis is protected by obj->lock, we no longer depend
on struct_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c | 54 -
10 matches
Mail list logo