On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 7:10 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 11:31 AM Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 4:59 PM Linus Walleij
> > wrote:
>
> > > > dsi->mode_flags =
> > > > MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS |
> > > > -
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 11:31 AM Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 4:59 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > dsi->mode_flags =
> > > MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS |
> > > - MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET;
> > > +
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 4:59 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:34 AM Nicolas Boichat wrote:
>
> > Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects,
> > e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET means that EoT packets will actually
> > be disabled. Fix this by including _NO
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:34 AM Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects,
> e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET means that EoT packets will actually
> be disabled. Fix this by including _NO_ in the flag names, e.g.
> MIPI_DSI_MODE_NO_EOT_PACKET.
Unless
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 3:21 PM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> W dniu 22.02.2021 o 06:31, Nicolas Boichat pisze:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 3:08 AM Laurent Pinchart
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Nicolas,
> >>
> >> Thank you for the patch.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:33:55AM +0800, Nicola
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 3:08 AM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:33:55AM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects,
> > e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET means that EoT packets
Hi Nicolas,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:33:55AM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects,
> e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET means that EoT packets will actually
> be disabled. Fix this by including _NO_ in the flag nam
Hi Nicolas
On 2021-02-10 19:33, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects,
e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET means that EoT packets will actually
be disabled. Fix this by including _NO_ in the flag names, e.g.
MIPI_DSI_MODE_NO_EOT_PACKET.
Signed-off-by
Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:33:55AM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects,
> e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET means that EoT packets will actually
> be disabled. Fix this by including _NO_ in the flag names, e.g.
> MIPI_DSI_MODE_N
Hi, Nicolas:
Nicolas Boichat 於 2021年2月11日 週四 上午11:34寫道：
>
> Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects,
> e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET means that EoT packets will actually
> be disabled. Fix this by including _NO_ in the flag names, e.g.
> MIPI_DSI_MODE_NO_EOT_PACKET.
For
Hey Nicolas,
Thanks for submitting this, making these flags more intuitive is really nice.
This looks good to me, feel free to add my r-b.
Reviewed-by: Robert Foss
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 04:34, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
>
> Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects,
> e.g.
Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects,
e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET means that EoT packets will actually
be disabled. Fix this by including _NO_ in the flag names, e.g.
MIPI_DSI_MODE_NO_EOT_PACKET.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat
---
I considered adding _DISABLE_ inste
12 matches
Mail list logo
