Hello All,
I bumped into the below check [1] enforced in drm_framebuffer creation which
checks the requested framebuffer width/height parameters against the drm
mode config width/height limits. As I understand, drm_mode_config: min/max
width/height indicate the upper and lower bounds of the displ
On 2018-02-28 11:18, Sean Paul wrote:
This is another piece that can be moved out of atomic to facilitate
using
the atomic helpers.
Change-Id: I6dc3c4e5df508942bbc378c73a44e46e511b8469
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul
Reviewed-by: Jeykumar Sankaran
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c |
On 2018-02-28 11:18, Sean Paul wrote:
Instead of duplicating whole swaths of atomic helper functions (which
are already out-of-date), just skip the encoder/crtc disables in the
.disable hooks.
Change-Id: I7bd9183ae60624204fb1de9550656b776efc7202
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul
Can you consider getti
On 2018-02-26 08:49, Sean Paul wrote:
They're not used, so let's get rid of them.
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul
Reviewed-by: Jeykumar Sankaran
---
include/drm/drm_connector.h | 19 ---
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_connector.h b/include/drm/drm_c
On 2018-02-21 13:42, Sean Paul wrote:
We need to have a discussion about how to introduce this in a way that
it can be leveraged by other platforms/userspaces. For now, remove
support since we don't need it yet.
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul
Reviewed-by: Jeykumar Sankaran
---
drivers/gpu/drm/d
On 2018-03-01 07:27, Sean Paul wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 08:07:00PM -0800, jsa...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-02-28 11:19, Sean Paul wrote:
> Moving further towards switching fully to the the atomic helpers, this
> patch removes the hand-rolled kthread nonblock commit code and uses
the
On 2018-02-28 11:19, Sean Paul wrote:
Moving further towards switching fully to the the atomic helpers, this
patch removes the hand-rolled kthread nonblock commit code and uses the
atomic helpers commit_work model.
There's still a lot of copypasta here, but it's still needed to
facilitate the sw
On 2018-02-26 07:21, Sean Paul wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:32:05PM -0800, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
Implementation of partial update in DPU DRM is heavily
dependent on custom properties and dsi hooks. Removing the
support for now. We may need to revisit the support in the
future.
Change-Id
On 2/13/2018 12:00 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
Hi dri-devel,
Qualcomm has been working for the past few weeks on forward porting their
downstream drm driver from 4.14 to mainline. Please consider this PR as a
request for review, rather than an attemp
