Re: [RFC] Clarification for “undefined behaviour”?

2025-03-06 Thread David Laight
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 17:30:28 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:17:32PM +0000, David Laight wrote: ... > > And the 'fun' starts because NULL isn't required to use the all-zero > > bit pattern. > > Regardless of the bit-pattern, things lik

Re: [RFC] Clarification for “undefined behaviour”?

2025-03-06 Thread David Laight
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 11:51:59 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 09:40:43AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > >>> The address of a data structure member was determined before > > >>> a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of > > >>> the functions “dpu_hw_pp_enable

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH] devcoredump: increase the device delete timeout to 10 mins

2022-02-28 Thread David Laight
From: Abhinav Kumar > Sent: 28 February 2022 21:38 ... > We also did some profiling around how much increasing the block size > helps and here is the data: > > Block sizecost > > 4KB 229s > 8KB86s You must have an O(n^2) operation in there - find it. David - R