On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
> Hi dri-devel,
> Qualcomm has been working for the past few weeks on forward porting their
> downstream drm driver from 4.14 to mainline. Please consider this PR as a
> request for review, rather than an attempt at mainlining the code as it
> curr
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:14 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 15/02/18 04:17, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> [...]
>>>
>>> Could you elaborate on what kind of locking you are concerned about?
>>> As I explained before, the normally happening fast path would lock
>>> dev->power_lock only for the brief moment of
Remove unused code from dpu_io_util.c. The functions are only
used inside of the msm driver so remove the EXPORT_SYMBOL
tags and move the header dpu_io_util.h from include/linux.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:18:13PM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
> Hi dri-devel,
> Qualcomm has been working for the past few weeks on forward porting their
> downstream drm driver from 4.14 to mainline. Please consider this PR as a
> request for review, rather than an attempt at mainlining the code as i
On 15/02/18 04:17, Tomasz Figa wrote:
[...]
Could you elaborate on what kind of locking you are concerned about?
As I explained before, the normally happening fast path would lock
dev->power_lock only for the brief moment of incrementing the runtime
PM usage counter.
My bad, that's not even it.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:09 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:12 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Jordan Crouse
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:31:29PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
- When submitting commands to the GPU, the GPU driver
