Or the quote on the web page should be End War by Waging Peace...
--chris
http://www.aotksc.com/
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Kernel question
> From: Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, September 07, 2006 10:10 pm
Hi, I called the file release 2036test because I had expected
some small bugs to be found soon after that release. And indeed,
after 2036test, I had to fix the VERSION= handling and I found
that COM port polling can be improved. Those updates are what
makes 2036test differ from 2036final, if you l
Quoting Daniel Quintiliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi FreeDOS team,
>
> Congrats on the release of FreeDOS 1.0 stable!
>
> As the maintainer of the GNU/DOS distribution, I had a question to
> ask. I noticed that FreeDOS 1.0 was considered "stable," yet the
> kernel file on the SourceForge page was
I would definitely consider the 2036 kernel to be more stable, but not
the one on sourceforge. Get the one from Eric Auer's homepage (google
for Auersoft).
On 9/7/06, Daniel Quintiliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi FreeDOS team,
>
> Congrats on the release of FreeDOS 1.0 stable!
>
> As the mai
Hi!
Michael McStarfighter wrote:
I want to know if the "original" FreeDOS kernel is 16bit or 32bit.
It always have 16-bit interface, notwithstanding if internally it
contains only 16-bit code or some code optimized as 32-bit.
I ask it because I coincidentally found the website
http:/
