Nice thinking, now to get the camera companies to use it.
I like. Keep the ball rolling.
cheers
DS
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:19:10 -0400 "TJ Edmister"
writes:
> MS implemented an arbitrary limit of 32GB for FAT32 volumes, but with
>
> third-party tools much larger ones are possible (up to 2TB?
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:19 PM, TJ Edmister wrote:
> MS implemented an arbitrary limit of 32GB for FAT32 volumes, but with
> third-party tools much larger ones are possible (up to 2TB?). Maybe those
> flash cards could be reformatted and used in the camera with FAT32 instead.
The volume size lim
MS implemented an arbitrary limit of 32GB for FAT32 volumes, but with
third-party tools much larger ones are possible (up to 2TB?). Maybe those
flash cards could be reformatted and used in the camera with FAT32 instead.
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:27:01 -0400, Dale E Sterner
wrote:
I've seen
I've seen a hand full of links for newly revised dos
games here.
I could use exFAT support for dos I read camera chips
into dos and play them on QV. I couldn't read my
brother in laws & my cousins new camera chips.
DOS usually dos better with chips. QV is
really good.
DS
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14
/If you are just browsing packages. It is far better to look at the
package “group” pages. Like the Utilities Group page,/
//
Agreed, it is easier, at least, for me it was.That is what I used, I
didn't even know about the complete listing when I browsed the group
listings.:)
Those are some
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, Ralf Quint wrote:
There are however patents on the way long file names are implemented on
FAT32 (https://www.google.com/patents/US5579517?dq=5,579,517,
https://www.google.com/patents/US5758352?dq=5,758,352)...
As far as I can tell, both of those patents have expired.
g.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> Many people like a challenge. The big plus for exFAT
> is its huge file size and fast operating speed.
They like a challenge where *they* will benefit from working on it.
See "scratching a personal itch" in the post you are responding to.
Many people like a challenge. The big plus for exFAT
is its huge file size and fast operating speed.
These people who write DOS games face that
difficulty all the time; they might already have
some ideas. Time will tell.
cheers
DS
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:27:45 -0400 dmccunney
writes:
> On Mon,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Ralf Quint wrote:
>> MS will jump on you if you try to use MS code. If you reverse engineer and
>> roll your own access programs, MS won't go after you. It's in their
>> interest to have the format readable on everything. As noted, support
>> on Linux exists.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> On the other hand there seem to be a number of good
> open sorce programmers out there. Why not create
> another file system that does the same thing as exFAT
> but make it free. Flash card makers are paying dear
> to use exFAT. FREE would p
On 8/14/2017 9:52 AM, dmccunney wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Ralf Quint wrote:
>
>> And as exFAT is a encumbered with software patents by Micro$oft, there
>> won't be any support in FreeDOS (or any other Open Source OS) in the
>> foreseeable future...
> So is FAT16/FAT32, but those ar
On the other hand there seem to be a number of good
open sorce programmers out there. Why not create
another file system that does the same thing as exFAT
but make it free. Flash card makers are paying dear
to use exFAT. FREE would push MS out of the exFAT
business.
cheers
DS
On Mon, 14 Aug 201
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Ralf Quint wrote:
> And as exFAT is a encumbered with software patents by Micro$oft, there
> won't be any support in FreeDOS (or any other Open Source OS) in the
> foreseeable future...
So is FAT16/FAT32, but those are supported pretty much everywhere.
MS will j
from Ralf Quint:
>
> On 8/13/2017 4:56 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> > New cameras are using a new format that I can't read.
> > I can read FAT 16 & FAT 32. Web search said that
> > they are using FAT 64. FDISK doesn't even detect it.
> > SD chips go undetected with this new format.
> As Dennis alre
On 8/13/2017 4:56 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> New cameras are using a new format that I can't read.
> I can read FAT 16 & FAT 32. Web search said that
> they are using FAT 64. FDISK doesn't even detect it.
> SD chips go undetected with this new format.
As Dennis already mentioned, newer cameras/SD
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> New cameras are using a new format that I can't read.
> I can read FAT 16 & FAT 32. Web search said that
> they are using FAT 64. FDISK doesn't even detect it.
> SD chips go undetected with this new format.
I think you mean exFAT. It's sup
New cameras are using a new format that I can't read.
I can read FAT 16 & FAT 32. Web search said that
they are using FAT 64. FDISK doesn't even detect it.
SD chips go undetected with this new format.
cheers
DS
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 13:01:54 -0500 Rugxulo writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Jerome Shidel wrote:
>
>> On Aug 12, 2017, at 7:32 PM, Pierre LaMontagne wrote:
>>
>> Isn't USB 1.1 & 2.0 supposed to be compatible? My 2.0 flash drive wasn't
>> recognized on
>> my FD 1.1 USB PC. Is there a util that can list available drives like in in
>>
> On Aug 12, 2017, at 7:32 PM, Pierre LaMontagne wrote:
>
> (I know it's the same thing, but it's easier to me to only have to look in
> Sound for relevant sound/music tools than scroll through a list of hundreds
> of programs, even if sorted / ordered.)
>
> For me too, in fact I used that ve
(I know it's the same thing, but it's easier to me to only have to look
in Sound for relevant sound/music tools than scroll through a list of
hundreds of programs, even if sorted / ordered.)
For me too, in fact I used that very same software listing that your
link provides to build my own repo
20 matches
Mail list logo
