Re: [Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list

2005-10-08 Thread Michael Devore
At 11:30 PM 10/8/2005 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: MD> We've discussed loading HIMEM at the DOS prompt after CONFIG.SYS processing MD> before, too. It's a bad idea that could easily open the floodgates of bug MD> reports for people wondering why their drivers aren't loading or working MD> p

Re: [Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list

2005-10-08 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 7-Окт-2005 14:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net: >> As far as EMM386, I am not sure one could ever reliably load EMM386 at >> the command prompt post CONFIG.SYS drivers and COMMAND shell, plus a BB> that would be a kind of virtual suicide indeed.

Re: [Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list

2005-10-08 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 7-Окт-2005 01:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net: >>So, it's runtime loadable (no idea if it would also crash on 8086) and MD> We've discussed loading HIMEM at the DOS prompt after CONFIG.SYS processing MD> before, too. It's a bad idea that coul

Re: [Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list

2005-10-07 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Michael Devore schreef: We've discussed loading HIMEM at the DOS prompt after CONFIG.SYS processing before, too. It's a bad idea that could easily open the floodgates of bug reports for people wondering why their drivers aren't loading or working properly, and why XMS/EMS memory or HMA/UMBs

Re: [Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list

2005-10-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, [Sorry again about the odd formatting of webmail] -- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 01:49:10 -0500 From: Michael Devore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net We'v

Re: [Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list

2005-10-06 Thread Michael Devore
At 10:58 PM 10/6/2005 +0200, Bernd Blaauw wrote: as for the nature of the XMS driver, to my surprise FDXMS286 *can* be loaded by DEVLOAD, a commandline loader. So, it's runtime loadable (no idea if it would also crash on 8086) and supports 80286 platform Huge drawback to that is that it's not a

Re: [Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list

2005-10-06 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Michael Devore schreef: Let us avoid the sillier debates. You cannot simultaneously argue that EMM386 may use a 386-level test to help configure loading at boot time, yet a separate program cannot legitimately perform the same test. The nature of EMM386 and HIMEM precludes loading them at a

Re: [Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list

2005-10-06 Thread Michael Devore
At 11:13 PM 10/4/2005 +0200, Eric Auer wrote: with> and The errorlevel thing would also have the problem that EMM386 and HIMEM are device drivers. You cannot do "if errorlevel ..." in config sys, so the suggested solution is ruled out. Let us avoid the sillier debates. You cannot simultane

[Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list

2005-10-04 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Brolin, > As far as I know, you could not write a generic AC97 driver, because > AC97 only defines a standard for audio codecs to conform to... Good point. I just had a quick look at /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.4-20a/sound/{oss/ac97*.?,pci/ac97/*.?} (9k lines of C in 12 files) and it seems that muc

[Freedos-user] re: re: FreeDOS Post-1.0 todo list

2005-10-04 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Michael! > >"soon please" - would be nice to have that soon after FreeDOS 1.0, e.g. > > before 2.0, for example: several EMM386 / HIMEM features... > aka, none. EMM386 is quite deliberately versioned at 2.x because it's > moved beyond what is needed and necessary for a FreeDOS 1.0+ relea