Hi,
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 5:30 PM Eric Auer via Freedos-user
wrote:
>
> the changes to nasm do not seem to affect the dos version either?
My announcement on BTTR (since at least ecm heavily uses NASM) said this:
Most of the changes came from 2.16.02 (April 4), e.g. "Fix external
references to
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 00:29:44 +0200
> From: Eric Auer
>
> and a dos port of gnupg where important features cannot be used
> because dos has no /dev/random (see bttr thread) be newsworthy?
The DOS port of gnupg should be fully functional now, both on
FreeDOS and MS-DOS. When generating keys,
[..]
> 1. I keep an eye on the "DOS Ain't Dead" forums via their RSS feed,
> and I thought the httpDOS announcement on "DOS Ain't Dead" was
> interesting. And we sometimes (not all the time, but sometimes) get
> people who ask what cool network stuff they can do with FreeDOS. And
> this was somethi
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 5:30 PM Eric Auer via Freedos-user
wrote:
>
>
> hi! as jim prefers all dos related things to be discussed on-list:
>
> why would a https server which is "not in real working condition"
> and a dos port of gnupg where important features cannot be used
> because dos has no /de
hi! as jim prefers all dos related things to be discussed on-list:
why would a https server which is "not in real working condition"
and a dos port of gnupg where important features cannot be used
because dos has no /dev/random (see bttr thread) be newsworthy?
the changes to nasm do not seem to
