Well i dare say it is a matter of how one spends their time.
Lynx, although someone has not done a strict DOS compile in a while, was
updated twice this week alone.
Kare
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I got Arachne working, somewhat.
It's good as long as you don't try to do
I got Arachne to download Links 2 which is how I got it into my FreeDOS
VM.
I had to change the path of the download directory, though.
It had only a partial path of /download (I think) which got it confused.
Steve
On 2019-08-30 00:15, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I never downloaded the latest A
> I got Arachne working, somewhat.
> It's good as long as you don't try to do anything risky like searching
Google.
> Then it locks up trying to verify images.
> It wasn't updated in over 6 years (correct me if I'm wrong) and the web
> apparently just changed too much
I got Arachne working, somewhat.
It's good as long as you don't try to do anything risky like searching
Google.
Then it locks up trying to verify images.
It wasn't updated in over 6 years (correct me if I'm wrong) and the web
apparently just changed too much for it since.
Was great in its d
Speaking personally, I could never get arachne to work at all.
If you try this compile and learn if cookies are supported I would
appreciate learning as much.
Karen
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, st...@vwebr.net wrote:
Hello Karen,
Glad something's came along to take up where Arachne left off.
I a
Hello Karen,
Glad something's came along to take up where Arachne left off.
I assume this is the link to download Links 2 ?
http://links.twibright.com/download/binaries/dos/
I'll try it out.
Steve
On 2019-08-29 19:51, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:33 PM Karen Lewel
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:33 PM Karen Lewellen wrote:
>
> Someone posted information regarding a new compile of the browser for DOS.
Where, BTTR's forum??
Though, in an unrelated discussion, I just now noticed that it was
updated (2.20) yesterday!
> I recall the post claiming it is the ide
Hi list members,
Someone posted information regarding a new compile of the browser for DOS.
I recall the post claiming it is the ideal tool for the modern DOS user.
two questions for anyone using this new compile.
First, does it incorporate, unlike some of the Linux editions, cookies?
second, ho
