Hi Kenneth,
The 2042 Kernel works great, also I was wrong about the partition size, I
have installed and reinstalled and forgot to update my GRUB!
Thank you for providing another option...now if someone could help me with
a TSR conflict for my Collins Dictionary. : )
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:18
Please try the kernel build (8086,FAT32) at
http://www.fdos.org/kernel/testing/olb/ and let me know if this one also
works for you. It is a variation of the mentioned patch.
This patch in its simplest form updates the characters in the common
separators and terminators.
Thank you,
Kenneth J. Dav
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Don Flowers wrote:
>
> Re: Online Bible Revisited:
> I am going to mark this thread solved. Mr. Rugxulo was kind of enough to
> recompile the 2041 svn kernel to take care of the FcbParseName bug.
I didn't add anything except Eric's tiny patch from 2007. It's t
Re: Online Bible Revisited:
I am going to mark this thread solved. Mr. Rugxulo was kind of enough to
recompile the 2041 svn kernel to take care of the FcbParseName bug.
The kernel doesn't report a partition size greater than 2.1gb, but that is
a bug I can live with. thanks to all, especially my rel
Shane - Thank you for the explanation. I was hoping there was an
archive somewhere of this "mystery" kernel, but it seems that the OP
was the recipient of a personally customized kernel. At least I know
that the fix is not some kind of switch that I could include in a
command line; and I will conti
Don: It's not the FreeCOM (COMMAND.COM), it's the kernel (KERNEL.SYS).
No, I don't have a copy of the kernel that makes the Online Bible work, but I'm
putting in a request to add the fix to the next kernel.
KERNEL FEATURE REQUEST: Online Bible expects one of the old CP/M-derived
functions, tha
Hi Bernd,
> Thanks for reporting the issues you're experiencing with the
> FAT16 kernels, multiple versions.
I'm the one who should say thanks, because as a user I'm the
beneficiary of your work :-) Besides, this gives me a sense of
participation.
> Latest FreeDOS CHKDSK is 0.92
That's the on
Em 14-07-2011 13:29, Bernd Blaauw escreveu:
> Op 14-7-2011 5:09, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros schreef:
>> I'm now using the 32-bit 2040 kernel, because none of these
>> errors has ever appeared under the previous 32-bit kernels, and
>> I'm hoping they will not appear under the new one e
Op 14-7-2011 5:09, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros schreef:
> I'm now using the 32-bit 2040 kernel, because none of these
> errors has ever appeared under the previous 32-bit kernels, and
> I'm hoping they will not appear under the new one either
> [fingers crossed].
>
> Any advice is we
Hi,
Here's some additional information about the file system
errors I've been getting.
Today I tried to use the 32-bit kernel (2040), and both
ChkDsk and Defrag ran normally. ChkDsk did not detect any
errors, and Defrag did its job as usual.
Immediately after that, I reverted to the
Although I have not confirmed this by testing (too painful), I have the
impression that the kind of file system error mentioned in my previous
message typically happens after copy or delete operations involving a rather
large number of files, say, a few hundred.
That was the case when I first repo
Hi,
Last year I wrote about a problem with 16-bit 2039 kernels in portable
computers: ChkDsk would report errors, and wouldn't even run.
I later found that the 2039 32-bit kernel did not produce these errors, so
I started using it in my two portables (IBM ThinkPad and Compaq Armada),
and the erro
26-Oct-2009 числа в 20:09 часов, Pat Villani написал(а) следующее:
Thank you.
> Hit the Project info link. It takes you to our sourceforge area where
> you can download the latest kernel.
>
> > Where I can download latest kernel? I'm wonder, there is no links on
> > freedos.org.
--
/Buzzer
Hit the Project info link. It takes you to our sourceforge area where
you can download the latest kernel.
Pat
2009/10/26 Buzzer <4625...@gmail.com>:
> Where I can download latest kernel? I'm wonder, there is no links on
> freedos.org.
> --
> /Buzzer () кампания ascii ribbon - против пис
Where I can download latest kernel? I'm wonder, there is no links on
freedos.org.
--
/Buzzer () кампания ascii ribbon - против писем в html формате
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - против проприетарных вложений
--
Hi everybody,
there were no answers to Japheth's mail from 21 Dec yet...
In my own experience, 2036 and 2038 behave the SAME, so
it would be interesting to know whether there really is
something that BROKE in 2038 or whether the Ctrl-C stuff
of HX and FreeDOS have some general incompatibility...
Or the quote on the web page should be End War by Waging Peace...
--chris
http://www.aotksc.com/
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Kernel question
> From: Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, September 07, 2006 10:10 pm
Hi, I called the file release 2036test because I had expected
some small bugs to be found soon after that release. And indeed,
after 2036test, I had to fix the VERSION= handling and I found
that COM port polling can be improved. Those updates are what
makes 2036test differ from 2036final, if you l
Quoting Daniel Quintiliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi FreeDOS team,
>
> Congrats on the release of FreeDOS 1.0 stable!
>
> As the maintainer of the GNU/DOS distribution, I had a question to
> ask. I noticed that FreeDOS 1.0 was considered "stable," yet the
> kernel file on the SourceForge page was
I would definitely consider the 2036 kernel to be more stable, but not
the one on sourceforge. Get the one from Eric Auer's homepage (google
for Auersoft).
On 9/7/06, Daniel Quintiliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi FreeDOS team,
>
> Congrats on the release of FreeDOS 1.0 stable!
>
> As the mai
Hi FreeDOS team,
Congrats on the release of FreeDOS 1.0 stable!
As the maintainer of the GNU/DOS distribution, I had a question to
ask. I noticed that FreeDOS 1.0 was considered "stable," yet the
kernel file on the SourceForge page was called "2036test." Is 2036 a
development version, or is
Hi!
Michael McStarfighter wrote:
I want to know if the "original" FreeDOS kernel is 16bit or 32bit.
It always have 16-bit interface, notwithstanding if internally it
contains only 16-bit code or some code optimized as 32-bit.
I ask it because I coincidentally found the website
http:/
Hi,
I want to know if the "original" FreeDOS kernel is 16bit or 32bit. I ask it because I coincidentally found the website http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/ and I want to use 32bit tools in FreeDOS, too (perhaps).
Thanks for answer.
P.S.: Answering in german language is preferred for me
Luchezar Georgiev a Ãcrit :
Just thinking maybe can use FreeDOS to rescue NTFS, if too complex
then drop it.
The read-only version of NTFSDOS is free, but the read-write version
isn't :(
But the ntfs tools on
ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/disk/ntfs.zip
.Are they
Just thinking maybe can use FreeDOS to rescue NTFS, if too complex then
drop it.
The read-only version of NTFSDOS is free, but the read-write version isn't
:(
Is FreeDOS ready for LFN? I mean LFN will affect the FAT table, is
FreeDOS already spare enough 'space' for the extra space? And other d
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:35:42 +0300, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
>Why not put up a list of FreeDOS-incompatible software so that problems
>can be solved one-by-one? Can you ask your friend to make a list of his
>software not running under FreeDOS and a brief description of the problem
>with each piece
Johnson Lam schreef:
Yes, and PCI-X is coming out, oops ... target change again.
PCI-X (PCI eXtended) is a server version of pci.
PCI-E is PCI-Express, which is new :)
Bernd
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java
æ ä ç
I got a friend testing FreeDOS and he report lots of problem with his
old software.
Why not put up a list of FreeDOS-incompatible software so that problems
can be solved one-by-one? Can you ask your friend to make a list of his
software not running under FreeDOS and a brief description of
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:02:33 +0300, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
>;-) So we have only 16% left now ;-)
Maybe already 10% less ;-)
I got a friend testing FreeDOS and he report lots of problem with his
old software.
>I agree. It's not accident that the ROM-DOS kernel supports LFNs.
I notice some of the
So I think both of them reached a certain level of stability, say 84% of
M$-DOS
;-) So we have only 16% left now ;-)
We need a new Victor Vlasenko to integrate LFN support in the kernel.
IMHO, LFN is a high priority task because we can really replace some
Windows application by FreeDOS.
I agree.
pretty sure I did use "UPX --8086 --best command.com"
please try http://fdos.org/ripcord/beta9-final/addon/odin7bin.zip
or get a newer FreeCOM version.
adding SWITCHES=/E to config.sys may also help.
Bernd
---
This SF.Net email is
Hi,
I copied the 2034 KERNEL.SYS and COMMAND.COM over the 0.6 ODIN, it does
not boot my Sharp PC4700 any more.
I selected an option from menu, press F8 for single stepping,
it freezes instead of loading:
'SHELL=A:\COMMAND.COM /E:1024 /P=A:\FDAUTO.BAT'
My machine equipped with an 80188 CPU, 6
At Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:48am -0600, John Price wrote:
> What is the different between ke2033_16.zip and
> ke2033_32.zip?
>
> Thanx,
> John
FAT32 support.
-uso.
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open T
What is the different between ke2033_16.zip and
ke2033_32.zip?
Thanx,
John
--
There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one
works.
www.GCFL.net (The Good, Clean Funnies List): Good, clean
funnies five times a week, no ads, for f_r_e_e!
-
34 matches
Mail list logo
