> But the Warcraft II that I`m familiar with did run under
> plain DOS (well... with DOS4GW).
Then the complete ReactOS discussion is pointless.
1. Get WC II working under FreeDOS (troubleshoot DOG4/SW or try DOS32/A)
2. Get the network working
> Only the included map editor needed Windows (3.1
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:58:34 -0500, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Michael Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> So yes, if I can run hxrt on top of freedos and come up with some sort
>> of packet driver for the PCI Realtek network card... that will be legal
>> and I won't have to
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Michael Robinson
wrote:
>
> So yes, if I can run hxrt on top of freedos and come up with some sort
> of packet driver for the PCI Realtek network card... that will be legal
> and I won't have to worry about how many computers I'm setting
> up to play Warcraf
On 2012-12-20 08:30 (GMT) dos386 composed:
> there is no solution for Win16
There is. It's just not free: OS/2 Warp (old IBM name) & eComStation (current
release)
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team
> I am curious if you can run Warcraft II under Wine
I never tested this WC II at all :-|
> ReactOS used to an effort to clone Windows 95
YO ... FreeWin95 IIRC "tried" to clone 95, ReactOS always
NT (but moving: NT4 -> 2K -> XP -> Wi$ta -> 7 -> 8 -> ???)
> until that was abandoned in favor of t
I think that MSFN has some great support for Win98 - I followed it for
some time a few years back and there are quite a few dedicated
volunteers there who had included USB 2.0 drivers, perfected the various
security updates etc. Plenty of debate there as to the legality of the
unofficial upgrades,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Michael Robinson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 03:32 +, dos386 wrote:
>> > I'm not even sure there's a reason to have FreeDOS in the mix.
>>
>> Sure there is, especially if your 98 copy isn't legal.
>
> My copy is sort of legal, but I don't have as many licen
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 03:32 +, dos386 wrote:
> > I'm not even sure there's a reason to have FreeDOS in the mix.
>
> Sure there is, especially if your 98 copy isn't legal.
My copy is sort of legal, but I don't have as many licenses for it
as I have computers running it. The computer I'm runni
> I'm not even sure there's a reason to have FreeDOS in the mix.
Sure there is, especially if your 98 copy isn't legal.
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
> why install win98?if the computer is specd for it, install freedos, and
> then install ubuntu and dual boot
> between the two. and use wine for windows stuff.
Because the intent is to play games that are native for Windows. If
the box w
why install win98?if the computer is specd for it, install freedos, and
then install ubuntu and dual boot between
the two. and use wine for windows stuff.
On Dec 19, 2012, at 1:36 PM, kurt godel wrote:
> The grub4dos approach is the best, since you can boot anything with it; if
> tha
The grub4dos approach is the best, since you can boot anything with it; if
that doesn't appeal to you,
I would say install the 98 first, as it was designed to commandeer the
entire works; the freedos stuff can be copied to the c drive *after an
initial installation/backup of the freedos, which is s
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:14 PM, kurt godel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim,
> I eventually got back to you, that I had *satisfactorily* done it, with 98
> in 'c', freedos in 'd'; the trick for me was
> to master 'devload' and shsucdx. The only bugaboo left is that DOSUSB still
> cannot coexist wi
Jim,
I eventually got back to you, that I had *satisfactorily* done it, with 98
in 'c', freedos in 'd'; the trick for me was
to master 'devload' and shsucdx. The only bugaboo left is that DOSUSB still
cannot coexist with cd rom when
fdos is in 'd', yet they do work together if fdos is in 'c'; this
14 matches
Mail list logo
