Hi!
19-Июл-2004 14:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> FD-HIMEM under FreeDOS uses 2.03k of low memory, MS-HIMEM - 47.8k. Ant
>>this is not much more, than 1.14k of MS-HIMEM under MS-DOS.
BB> as told, the 47.8KB usage is a bug in MS's kernel (IO.SYS , dos 7.10,
Arkady V.Belousov schreef:
EA> is at best simplistic (okay, ClamAV ClamScan is not ;-)),
EA> our HIMEM does not load parts of itself to HMA,
FD-HIMEM under FreeDOS uses 2.03k of low memory, MS-HIMEM - 47.8k. Ant
this is not much more, than 1.14k of MS-HIMEM under MS-DOS.
EA> make HIMEM load par
Steve Nickolas - Using Windoze escribió:
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote:
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS
does not have one either.
Everybody agrees?
Personally I agree. I think MS-DOS 6.20+ is the only DOS with a
surface scanner? DR-DOS
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:35:06 +0200, you wrote:
Hi,
>>I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS
>>does not have one either.
>>
>Everybody agrees?
Scandisk can be later, but the CHKDSK or DOSFSCK still have FAT32
problem. IMO at least one program should work correctly.
R
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote:
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS
does not have one either.
Everybody agrees?
Personally I agree. I think MS-DOS 6.20+ is the only DOS with a surface
scanner? DR-DOS 7, does it have one? PC DOS 7 certainly d
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS
does not have one either.
Everybody agrees?
PS: Shrinking DISPLAY to half size should be easy (it now has 2 buffers
for each font size I think), just let the 2nd buffer reside e.g. in XMS.
Changes are on
Hi!
19-Июл-2004 03:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA> is at best simplistic (okay, ClamAV ClamScan is not ;-)),
EA> our HIMEM does not load parts of itself to HMA,
FD-HIMEM under FreeDOS uses 2.03k of low memory, MS-HIMEM - 47.8k. Ant
this is not much more, tha
Hi!
I have closed:
http://www.freedos.org/bugs/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1022
and updated:
http://www.freedos.org/bugs/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=998
I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS
does not have one either.
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/os/dos/psm952a.html
tell
