On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 2:24 PM E. Auer wrote:
>
> Hi Diego,
>
> I think Jim is just trying to encourage FDBOX to add features :-)
> Tom is right that FDBOX as it is now is not yet really useful.
> [..]
> Developers for DOS are rare, so Tom may prefer improvements for
> existing DOS software inste
Hi Diego,
I think Jim is just trying to encourage FDBOX to add features :-)
Tom is right that FDBOX as it is now is not yet really useful.
Why does it matter whether FreeCOM or FDBOX run on Windows,
Linux or Apple? You can run DOS on all of them, using either
a DOS emulator or a virtual PC whi
Hi Tom,
On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 9:31 PM tom ehlert wrote:
> Could you please explain why you think this is relevant?
> Any fancy feature that FreeCOM is missing?
> Anything that FDBOX is doing better?
>
freecom does not compile/run on windows.
freecom does not compile/run on linux
freecom does n
Hi Diego,
> I releasing the first version of fdbox, a new shell for MSDOS/freeDOS,
> aka command.com. This is a very initial release, most of the features
> are semi broken, or work in progress. But the very basic code is there
> (you can dir, cd and execute applications).
Could you please explai
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 1:09 AM Diego Iastrubni wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I releasing the first version of fdbox, a new shell for MSDOS/freeDOS,
> aka command.com. This is a very initial release, most of the features
> are semi broken, or work in progress. But the very basic code is there
> (you can d
Hi all,
I releasing the first version of fdbox, a new shell for MSDOS/freeDOS,
aka command.com. This is a very initial release, most of the features
are semi broken, or work in progress. But the very basic code is there
(you can dir, cd and execute applications).
The code is available https://git
