> No. I'm working as an IT technician. So this
> only from the last couple of years.
OK, testing PC's daily, also USB support in INT $13
> 2) No, but get *different* ones.
The 6 are different. BTW, I didn't write I would OWN them all.
> Stupid example: You've never seen a single car accident "l
dos386 wrote:
>> I haven't tested, but actually *used* these.
>
> Several 100's PC's in 20 years ?
No. I'm working as an IT technician. So this only from the last couple
of years.
>> How do you know? From your probably buggy 6 PCs?
>
> So I should throw them all away and buy 1 or 6 new ones ?
> From what time are your 6 PCs?
distributed over last 15 years
> Any 2004+ mainstream PC I've seen contains
> a BIOS version which I know supports booting from USB
2 attempted but didn't work ...
> no 2004+ mainstream PC I've seen (except x86 Macs) contains EFI.
yet ...
> Some of the BIOSes
>> I haven't tested, but actually *used* these.
>
> Several 100's PC's in 20 years ? Hope at least one was from 1990 and
> also worked :-)
Of course PCs from 1990 don't support USB.
>> How do you know? From your probably buggy 6 PCs?
>
> So I should throw them all away and buy 1 or 6 new ones ?
>
> I haven't tested, but actually *used* these.
Several 100's PC's in 20 years ? Hope at least one was from 1990 and
also worked :-)
> How do you know? From your probably buggy 6 PCs?
So I should throw them all away and buy 1 or 6 new ones ?
With "EFI" instead of "BIOS", so very helpful for DOS U
dos386 wrote:
>> From hundreds of PCs only a few failed here.
>
> WOW !!! You have / had and tested that many ?
I haven't tested, but actually *used* these.
> "BIOS USB storage support" is nice for those
> having it "accidentally" working, but definitely
> not a generic DOS USB solution, the mi
> ... you did something wrong.
NO. I didn't buy any of them at given short time (2003 to 2008 ?)
caring about "BIOS USB storage support"
> From hundreds of PCs only a few failed here.
WOW !!! You have / had and tested that many ?
"BIOS USB storage support" is nice for those
having it "accidenta
dos386 wrote:
>> It must be supported by your BIOS.
>
>>From cca 6 PC's I could test within last 2 years 1 tries but fails and
> the remaining 5 don't even try. So ...
... you did something wrong. From hundreds of PCs only a few failed here.
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-sof
> It must be supported by your BIOS.
>From cca 6 PC's I could test within last 2 years 1 tries but fails and
the remaining 5 don't even try. So ...
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Tria
dos386 wrote:
>> but actually an even easier way is to let the BIOS do the lowlevel stuff.
>> Then your stick looks like a normal int13
>> disk for DOS and it will see all FAT16 and FAT32 partitions.
>
> How ?
It must be supported by your BIOS. My 2003 Compaq Evo N620c does. USB
flash drives are
> I'm aware that USBASPI.sys and DI1000DD.sys work to provide USB
DI1000DD.SYS is crap ...
> I personally prefer (Adaptec?) ASPIDISK instead of DI1000DD
Where to get it ?
> but actually an even easier way is to let the BIOS do the lowlevel stuff.
> Then your stick looks like a normal int13
> di
Hi David,
> I have an old DOS application that I want to run with FreeDOS. The DOS
> app uses a memory stick for storage and has a custom USB driver. The
You mean your DOS app also uses USB? Is it possible to put the
thing accessed by the DOS app on another controller than the
USB stick? Then
Hi,
I have an old DOS application that I want to run with FreeDOS. The DOS
app uses a memory stick for storage and has a custom USB driver. The
driver is due to be retired for a variety of reasons including that it
doesn't support modern memory sticks.
I'm aware that USBASPI.sys and DI1000DD.
13 matches
Mail list logo
