On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:57 PM, dmccunney wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
>>
>>> Just heard about LaTeX here and being curious, just want to understand -
>>
>> It's worth learning about, but DOS is the wrong place
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:57 PM, dmccunney wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
>
>> Just heard about LaTeX here and being curious, just want to understand -
>
> It's worth learning about, but DOS is the wrong place to do it. The
> tools basically don't exist there.
thanks for the reply
cheers
DS
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 21:57:26 -0400 dmccunney
writes:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Dale E Sterner
> wrote:
> > Just heard about LaTeX here and being curious, just want to
> understand -
> > learn more about it. I use DOS Wordperfect 6.2 for most
> everything
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> Just heard about LaTeX here and being curious, just want to understand -
> learn more about it. I use DOS Wordperfect 6.2 for most everything, just
> wonder
> if LaTeX can do more. Looks like its a script language like HTML that has
> to be
Just heard about LaTeX here and being curious, just want to understand -
learn
more about it. I use DOS Wordperfect 6.2 for most everything, just wonder
if LaTeX can do more. Looks like its a script language like HTML that has
to be compiled
to a PS file then converted to pdf by ghost.
cheers
DS.
I found one labeled version 7 for DOS. Haven't had time to try it yet.
I wonder if it actully works. I like the idea of making pdf on dos.
Something to talk about.
cheers
DS
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 14:56:11 -0500 Rugxulo writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Dale E Sterner
> wrote:
Hi, (I'm late replying again!)
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Krys Garnett wrote:
>
> I'm resurrecting an old desktop for a "distraction free" environment
So? Any updates you can tell us? How has it been going?
> and I'm wondering whether it is easier or more useful to use Freedos
> or MS DOS
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
>
> Thanks for the links update - very useful. Especially ghost 5 for dos.
Maybe that's exactly what you want, but I highly doubt it. GhostScript
hasn't been directly supported on DOS in years and years. I don't know
what the last "offi
Hi,
I know I'm late, but
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
>
> Is there a DOS-english version of LaTeX left to download from anywhere.
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:25:58 -0400 dmccunney
> writes:
>>
>> The official TeX repository for MS-DOS is
>> http://www.ctan.org/te
Is there a DOS-english version of LaTeX left to download from anywhere.
cheers
DS
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:25:58 -0400 dmccunney
writes:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dale E Sterner
> wrote:
>
> > Tried your provided link. The links on that page, no longer seem
> to be
> > valid.
>
>
Thanks for the links update - very useful. Especially ghost 5 for dos.
cheers
DS
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:25:58 -0400 dmccunney
writes:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dale E Sterner
> wrote:
>
> > Tried your provided link. The links on that page, no longer seem
> to be
> > valid.
>
> The
Simtel is mirrored at Archive.org [0][1].
[0] https://archive.org/details/simtelnet_bu_mirror_2013_04
[1]
http://ia601702.us.archive.org/zipview.php?zip=/18/items/simtelnet_bu_mirror_2013_04/simtelnet.bu.mirror.2013.04.zip
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:25 PM, dmccunney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> Tried your provided link. The links on that page, no longer seem to be
> valid.
The first one, to dante.de, is broken for the English language page,
which doesn't seem to exist now. The German site is up at
http://www.dante.de/
Ghostscr
On 9/22/2014 8:35 AM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> Tried your provided link. The links on that page, no longer seem to be
> valid.
>
Works just fine here...
Ralf
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
-
Tried your provided link. The links on that page, no longer seem to be
valid.
cheers
DS
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:24:04 +0200 Angel M Alganza writes:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:48:28PM +0100, Krys
> Garnett wrote:
>
> [...]
> > It's primarily for academic writing, so decent
> > support for foot
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:48:28PM +0100, Krys
Garnett wrote:
[...]
> It's primarily for academic writing, so decent
> support for footnotes, endnotes and tables is
[...]
Nothing beats LaTeX for academic and scientific writing!
http://freedos.gds.tuwien.ac.at/freedos/news/technote/106.html
Che
On 09/14/2014 01:48 PM, Krys Garnett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm resurrecting an old desktop for a "distraction free" environment
> and I'm wondering whether it is easier or more useful to use Freedos
> or MS DOS 6.22, which I have the original 3.5" disks for.
>
> The system is a Tandon 386SX, 8mb RAM, 51
2014-09-14 22:48 GMT+02:00, Krys Garnett :
> Hi,
>
> I'm resurrecting an old desktop for a "distraction free" environment
> and I'm wondering whether it is easier or more useful to use Freedos
> or MS DOS 6.22, which I have the original 3.5" disks for.
>
> The system is a Tandon 386SX, 8mb RAM, 512
Hi,
I'm resurrecting an old desktop for a "distraction free" environment
and I'm wondering whether it is easier or more useful to use Freedos
or MS DOS 6.22, which I have the original 3.5" disks for.
The system is a Tandon 386SX, 8mb RAM, 512mb HD, 3.5" and 5.25" floppy
drives, no USB, no CD-ROM,
19 matches
Mail list logo
