On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 21:36 +0800, Johnson Lam wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:24:06 +0200, you wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> >You forget to mention F-Prot's resident shield or reliability. ClamAV is
> >far from perfect and so it is NOT a replacement for F-Prot.
>
> Oh! I forgot, thanks for remindin
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:24:06 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Robert,
>You forget to mention F-Prot's resident shield or reliability. ClamAV is
>far from perfect and so it is NOT a replacement for F-Prot.
Oh! I forgot, thanks for reminding me, it's been a long time.
I use F-PROT because SCAN become slow li
Johnson Lam wrote:
> Clam have no official for DOS (DOS version port by Blair Campbell,
> have some minor problems), and without a nice UI like F-PROT.
You forget to mention F-Prot's resident shield or reliability. ClamAV is
far from perfect and so it is NOT a replacement for F-Prot.
Robert Rieb
